Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Do alphabets need to be so complicated?

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
115 messages over 15 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9 ... 14 15 Next >>
William Camden
Hexaglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6273 days ago

1936 posts - 2333 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Russian, Turkish, French

 
 Message 65 of 115
18 October 2010 at 11:22am | IP Logged 
Some time ago on this forum, this subject came up. I speculated that the Chinese writing system helped keep down Chinese literacy rates, compared to an alphabetical system. A Chinese assured me this was not so, but it seemed to me at least a little counter-intuitive to say that. Chinese characters may require up to 33 strokes to write, there are thousands of them and many look quite similar to each other.People can have literacy problems even with alphabets of 20-35 letters, but having to learn thousands of characters simply magnifies problems, I would have thought.
4 persons have voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6583 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 66 of 115
18 October 2010 at 12:03pm | IP Logged 
One Chinese character does not correspond with one alphabetic letter.
2 persons have voted this message useful



fireflies
Senior Member
Joined 5182 days ago

172 posts - 234 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 68 of 115
18 October 2010 at 3:56pm | IP Logged 
William Camden wrote:
People can have literacy problems even with alphabets of 20-35 letters,


That is very true. Literate people can have very imprecise spelling too (and bad handwriting).

Penmanship used to be an art that people were trained in but that is not the case today.


2 persons have voted this message useful



Old Chemist
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5174 days ago

227 posts - 285 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German

 
 Message 69 of 115
18 October 2010 at 5:25pm | IP Logged 
fireflies wrote:
William Camden wrote:
People can have literacy problems even with alphabets of 20-35 letters,


That is very true. Literate people can have very imprecise spelling too (and bad handwriting).

Penmanship used to be an art that people were trained in but that is not the case today.


It has just occurred to me that knowing Chinese characters might be similar to having a good sense of art, I mean some people can imagine pictures with no difficulty and others of us struggle. If you allow me the point of Chinese characters being very artistic (sometimes modern art!) representations of things, perhaps it develops an artistic sense in native Chinese speakers so that they find it easier to remember such abstract, symbolic representations of things. There again, in the modern world we have many standard and non-standard ways of "graphing" a word without using an alphabet. The most cursory look around any town will convince anyone of this.
1 person has voted this message useful



William Camden
Hexaglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6273 days ago

1936 posts - 2333 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, Russian, Turkish, French

 
 Message 70 of 115
19 October 2010 at 1:47pm | IP Logged 
Ari wrote:
One Chinese character does not correspond with one alphabetic letter.


I never said it did.
1 person has voted this message useful



Dragonsheep
Groupie
United States
Joined 5271 days ago

46 posts - 63 votes 
Studies: Tagalog, English*
Studies: Japanese, Latin

 
 Message 71 of 115
21 October 2010 at 4:00am | IP Logged 
Learning characters also requires a certain degree of effort.

Characters limit literacy to only the percent of the population that is disicinplined and academic enough to become literate. It sorta helps with "natural selection" in a societal sense. The less disciplied are weeded out and forced into shape to become literate, which is essential to survival in a modern world.
2 persons have voted this message useful



fireflies
Senior Member
Joined 5182 days ago

172 posts - 234 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 72 of 115
21 October 2010 at 4:19am | IP Logged 
There is no sense in making a basic task harder than it has to be on purpose just to exclude people (unless you want to create a tractable peasant class on purpose). There are plenty of other subjects you can hone your thinking skills and discipline in that are naturally and uniformly hard across all the languages.

I don't believe that the Chinese government wants to make literacy a struggle in this day and age.

Edited by fireflies on 21 October 2010 at 4:32am



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 115 messages over 15 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 810 11 12 13 14 15  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5625 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.