115 messages over 15 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 3 ... 14 15 Next >>
Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6600 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 17 of 115 04 January 2015 at 3:30am | IP Logged |
luke wrote:
Having said that, English, Spanish, Chinese, French, Russian, and their dialects will likely all have more speakers than they have today. |
|
|
I doubt it about Russian...
Or well, the number might be somewhat higher but the percentage will be lower imo.
4 persons have voted this message useful
| s_allard Triglot Senior Member Canada Joined 5433 days ago 2704 posts - 5425 votes Speaks: French*, English, Spanish Studies: Polish
| Message 18 of 115 04 January 2015 at 7:02am | IP Logged |
It seems to me that the distinction should be made between the languages with the most native speakers
and the language most widely spoken. Most of the discussion so far in this thread has really been more
about the former category. In the latter category, English is way ahead of the pack. Is there another
language gaining on English as a language of international reach? Think of the language of science,
technology, international finance, military cooperation, aviation, international higher education, etc. I
don't seeing any language coming close to replacing English in these areas.
1 person has voted this message useful
| tarvos Super Polyglot Winner TAC 2012 Senior Member China likeapolyglot.wordpr Joined 4710 days ago 5310 posts - 9399 votes Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish
| Message 19 of 115 04 January 2015 at 7:45pm | IP Logged |
Dutch. The sea levels will suddenly rise, the Dutch will be the only nation with
sufficient civil engineering skills to survive, and they will slowly but surely conquer
the earth, as they meant to do ages ago. All other nations suddenly have to dispatch half
their medical staff to specialised courses for "tonsillitis".
:D
Edited by tarvos on 04 January 2015 at 7:45pm
3 persons have voted this message useful
| Solfrid Cristin Heptaglot Winner TAC 2011 & 2012 Senior Member Norway Joined 5337 days ago 4143 posts - 8864 votes Speaks: Norwegian*, Spanish, Swedish, French, English, German, Italian Studies: Russian
| Message 20 of 115 05 January 2015 at 6:23am | IP Logged |
I'm with s allard on this, and it is of course stating the obvious, but I see no way that any other language will
get the chance to be as dominant in arts, technology, computer science etc as English. At least not in my
lifetime, which hopefully is until 2050.
2 persons have voted this message useful
| liam.pike1 Groupie Australia Joined 3757 days ago 84 posts - 122 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish, Esperanto, French
| Message 21 of 115 05 January 2015 at 7:19am | IP Logged |
I don't care what language is the most dominant one in 2050, as long as it isn't Mandarin or Arabic.
2 persons have voted this message useful
| robarb Nonaglot Senior Member United States languagenpluson Joined 5062 days ago 361 posts - 921 votes Speaks: Portuguese, English*, German, Italian, Spanish, Dutch, Swedish, Esperanto, French Studies: Mandarin, Danish, Russian, Norwegian, Cantonese, Japanese, Korean, Polish, Greek, Latin, Nepali, Modern Hebrew
| Message 22 of 115 05 January 2015 at 9:48pm | IP Logged |
Serpent wrote:
Luke wrote:
Having said that, English, Spanish, Chinese, French, Russian, and their dialects will likely all have more speakers
than they have today.
|
|
|
I doubt it about Russian...
Or well, the number might be somewhat higher but the percentage will be lower imo.
|
|
|
The sentiment of Luke's statement is true, but rather than Russian it would be better to bring up big languages
with growing demographics such as Portuguese, Hindi-Urdu, Bengali, Arabic, and maybe Indonesian.
Solfrid Cristin wrote:
I'm with s allard on this, and it is of course stating the obvious, but I see no way that any other language will
get the chance to be as dominant in arts, technology, computer science etc as English. At least not in my
lifetime, which hopefully is until 2050.
|
|
|
35 years is such a short timescale. It seems super obvious that another global language will not replace English
so quickly. However, given that English is the first language to become a prestige language on a truly global scale
and in an age of instant worldwide communication, some have claimed that it has reached the point of no return,
and will remain the language of international communication from now on . Common supporting
arguments for this claim:
1. Switches of the prestige language usually involve a transfer of power to some outside group-- but unlike in
the past, English is the prestige language everywhere.
2. The non-English language most likely to dominate in numbers and economic power in the near future,
Mandarin, is considered inaccessible to foreigners and "too hard" to learn.
3. English is dominant in nearly every field, unlike in the past where Italian competed in music and German
competed in chemistry, etc.
4. There is a lot of inertia; people don't want to switch.
All of these reasons seem pretty strong to me except the argument from difficulty; historically the rise of
languages to prestige doesn't seem to be strongly determined by how hard they are to learn. Given the
motivation, anyone can learn enough to communicate; Chinese and Vietnamese are willing to communicate with
each other in English even though it's terribly difficult for both of them.
What would it take to unseat English? I can think of a few scenarios with various degrees of plausibility:
- The idea of a constructed auxiliary language finally finds a zeitgeist where it works. It won't be Esperanto.
Seems unlikely, but the culture of the future is hard to predict.
- A non-English-speaking state reaches a level of dominance such that it can impose its language as the
international one. I'm pretty sure that 21st-century China won't do this. But it doesn't seem impossible that a
non-Anglophone country could establish hegemony someday, and if its language were more global than
Mandarin currently is, it could replace English.
- Global catastrophe could cause the institutions that global English dominates to collapse, plunging the world
back into pre-20th century linguistic pluralism.
- Technology could make the cost of cross-linguistic communication much lower, either by machine translation
or by making it significantly easier to learn a foreign language. If by translation, it could eliminate the need for a
global language, with everyone just using their native language and the technology bridging the gap. If by easing
the learning process, it could reduce inertia to the degree that a cultural whim could be enough to trigger a
switch in a future world where English no longer makes sense except by tradition.
4 persons have voted this message useful
| s_allard Triglot Senior Member Canada Joined 5433 days ago 2704 posts - 5425 votes Speaks: French*, English, Spanish Studies: Polish
| Message 23 of 115 06 January 2015 at 2:13am | IP Logged |
robarb wrote:
...
35 years is such a short timescale. It seems super obvious that another global language will not
replace English
so quickly. However, given that English is the first language to become a prestige language on a truly
global scale
and in an age of instant worldwide communication, some have claimed that it has reached the point of
no return,
and will remain the language of international communication from now on . Common supporting
arguments for this claim:
1. Switches of the prestige language usually involve a transfer of power to some outside group-- but
unlike in
the past, English is the prestige language everywhere.
2. The non-English language most likely to dominate in numbers and economic power in the near
future,
Mandarin, is considered inaccessible to foreigners and "too hard" to learn.
3. English is dominant in nearly every field, unlike in the past where Italian competed in music and
German
competed in chemistry, etc.
4. There is a lot of inertia; people don't want to switch.
All of these reasons seem pretty strong to me except the argument from difficulty; historically the rise
of
languages to prestige doesn't seem to be strongly determined by how hard they are to learn. Given the
motivation, anyone can learn enough to communicate; Chinese and Vietnamese are willing to
communicate with
each other in English even though it's terribly difficult for both of them.
... |
|
|
I agree generally with this post but I want to suggest a few nuances. First, I would suggest that English
is not so much a prestige language as a lingua franca. If we use the word prestige in the sense of high
culture, admiration, elitism and respect, French is probably the most prestigious language around.
English is probably second or maybe third, after Italian.
But English is certainly the totally dominant language of international communication. In this sense it is
rather unique. Except for indigenous minority languages within English-speaking countries, few native
languages are actually being displaced by English. As ubiquitous as English has become in the
Scandinavian countries and in Holland, I don't get the impression that the local languages are
threatened.
However, English has become the de facto language of communication between speakers of all the
other languages. This is not a matter of prestige but more one of gathering momentum. As has been
pointed out, nothing comes remotely closely to slowing the spread of English. One only has to look at
the numbers of people studying the various languages in the world. I don't have any figures on hand
but I would think that there are more people studying English than the total of all people studying the
other languages in the world. Compare the number of people in China studying English to the people
studying Chinese Mandarin.
Finally, I would suggest that ease of learning does play a role here. Although political and economic
factors play an important role in the spread of a language, a number of features of English, especially
when compared to the other major languages, help to make English a good candidate for world
domination. Here are a couple:
1. No grammatical gender.
2. Hardly any noun declensions.
3. Simple logical word order.
4. Simple verb conjugations. The only complications are the past forms and past participles.
5. Simple number agreement morphology.
6. A simple writing system with no diacritics.
7. Pretty simple pronunciation despite a rather chaotic spelling system.
Now compare this to any of the major languages out there. Mandarin Chinese, Hindi, French, Spanish,
Russian and Arabic all have major handicaps. I will certainly not be around for the next hundred years
but I am convinced that English will still be the dominant medium of international communication
during this time.
3 persons have voted this message useful
| tastyonions Triglot Senior Member United States goo.gl/UIdChYRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 4668 days ago 1044 posts - 1823 votes Speaks: English*, French, Spanish Studies: Italian
| Message 24 of 115 06 January 2015 at 2:57am | IP Logged |
In an improbable turn of events, all of South America unites to form one enormous superstate and Portuñol
takes over the globe.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.4707 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|