furyou_gaijin Senior Member Japan Joined 6378 days ago 540 posts - 631 votes Speaks: Latin*
| Message 97 of 123 14 September 2007 at 12:29pm | IP Logged |
xtremelingo wrote:
foryou,
Quote:
I happily admit to having no idea how Rosetta Stone (or most other commercially available language courses)
works. Yet comparison between filtering out colours in the picture and grammar elements in the sentence is a
very odd one.
|
|
|
Wow and you seem to think you know what you are talking about then? So in this entire discussion,
you really had no idea what you were talking about.
Why don't you try Rosetta Stone first, before you make a judgement as to how it works. Because yes, Rosetta
Stone is actually pretty good at teaching grammar, it is just not effective for learning dialogue or speaking in 1st
person. If effective dialogue could be taught using the Rosetta Stone method, you would see many people
applaud this as a remarkable breakthrough. As Rosetta Stone is one of the best examples of a program using
visual intuition to learn listening comprehension. |
|
|
Oh, so this entire discussion was about Rosetta Stone then?! Pity the innocent forum members who
assumed it was about Tarzan speak and language learning techniques from the start.
For the sake of completeness and in order to distance myself from Those Who Choose to Drop Arguments That
Are Uncomfortable For Them, let me state that I am unlikely to try Rosetta Stone or any other mainstream
methods at any point of time in the future, for reasons that are too numerous and too irrelevant to this
discussion - although I am sure they are all excellent methods for the right kind of student.
xtremelingo wrote:
Unless you have verified, tested and validated these claims yourself, from both studies
and 'senior' language learners (whom I am skeptical of some in terms of their claimed language fluency), you
also have an invalid judgement. Your arguement, and premise is not based on any evidence (of your own), but
instead claims of others.
Yes, I do urge all language learners to do their own research, instead of believing the claims of some 'senior'
language learners, as their suggestions are also invalidated by thousands of years of education research.
|
|
|
And fire leaves ugly burn marks. But don't trust my experience - especially because I have no evidence of my
own. Feel free to do your own research.
xtremelingo wrote:
Unless you have verified, tested and validated these claims yourself, from both studies
and 'senior' language learners (whom I am skeptical of some in terms of their claimed language fluency),
you also have an invalid judgement. Your arguement, and premise is not based on any evidence (of your own),
but instead claims of others. |
|
|
Here. Here's what worried me through this whole thread. Everyone has typos. But some things are not
typos. They are evidence of the absence of a good grammatical base. Once again, are you sure English is your
first language?! It isn't for me but even with my humble skills I seem to be able to detect numerous grammatical
irregularities in your texts. This is nothing to be ashamed of in itself but in the context of this discussion
it kind of illustrates the whole danger of Tarzan talk. Moreover, you claim to be a teacher of English...
Edited by furyou_gaijin on 14 September 2007 at 12:34pm
1 person has voted this message useful
|
manny Triglot Senior Member United States Joined 6350 days ago 248 posts - 240 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish, Tagalog Studies: French, German
| Message 98 of 123 14 September 2007 at 2:16pm | IP Logged |
edwin wrote:
manny wrote:
We know that children learn languages faster. |
|
|
Sorry, I don't know about that. Are you sure? Any scientific proof?
The reason why many immigrants seeing their kids speak the local language better is that they themselves are not immersed in the language as much as their kids are.
I believe that given the equal amount of immersion in the language, adults should learn faster, as they are smarter.
|
|
|
Any scientific proof?
Why do younger family members learn the same foreign language with less of an accent?
It seems you rely on your own your beliefs, but require others to have scientific proof. It would help if you were more consistent.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
jeff_lindqvist Diglot Moderator SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name Joined 6901 days ago 4250 posts - 5711 votes Speaks: Swedish*, English Studies: German, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Irish, French Personal Language Map
| Message 99 of 123 14 September 2007 at 3:06pm | IP Logged |
manny wrote:
edwin wrote:
(...)I believe that given the equal amount of immersion in the language, adults should learn faster, as they are smarter. |
|
|
Any scientific proof?
Why do younger family members learn the same foreign language with less of an accent?(...) |
|
|
Wild guess - while children's brains are said to have a certain "plasticity" making them able to pick up accents, prosody et.c. more easily (even close to native level), adults should be quite comfortable learning new things as their brains should be in quite good "shape". Any thoughts?
1 person has voted this message useful
|
FSI Senior Member United States Joined 6351 days ago 550 posts - 590 votes Speaks: English*
| Message 100 of 123 14 September 2007 at 3:16pm | IP Logged |
manny wrote:
Why do younger family members learn the same foreign language with less of an accent?
|
|
|
Possibly because younger family members have not spent nearly as many years solidifying the speech patterns of their original languages?
This is like asking why someone who has been staring at a red wall for thirty minutes will find it harder to accurately determine the color of a new wall than someone who's been staring at the red wall for thirty seconds. Do you really think it's because the second person is intrinsically better at determining wall colors?
Learning to do something one way makes it harder to learn to a similar thing a different way. Younger people, by definition, have spent less time internalizing one language's patterns, and would be quite abnormal if they didn't find it easier to learn the patterns of new languages than people whose brains, ears, and vocal systems had been tuned to the production and interpretation of one language for decades.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
manny Triglot Senior Member United States Joined 6350 days ago 248 posts - 240 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish, Tagalog Studies: French, German
| Message 101 of 123 14 September 2007 at 3:17pm | IP Logged |
If this is too involved, we may have to start a new thread?
1 person has voted this message useful
|
edwin Triglot Senior Member Canada towerofconfusi&Registered users can see my Skype Name Joined 6456 days ago 160 posts - 183 votes 9 sounds Speaks: Cantonese*, English, Mandarin Studies: French, Spanish, Portuguese
| Message 102 of 123 14 September 2007 at 3:38pm | IP Logged |
Just did.
http://how-to-learn-any-language.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?T ID=7244&PN=1
Oops. I should be out of here.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
alexptrans Pentaglot Senior Member Israel Joined 6757 days ago 208 posts - 236 votes Speaks: English, Modern Hebrew, Russian*, French, Arabic (Written) Studies: Icelandic
| Message 103 of 123 15 September 2007 at 2:51am | IP Logged |
Funny thread. Feels like being on hidden camera.
1 person has voted this message useful
|
xtremelingo Trilingual Triglot Senior Member Canada Joined 6279 days ago 398 posts - 515 votes Speaks: English*, Hindi*, Punjabi* Studies: German, French, Arabic (Written)
| Message 104 of 123 15 September 2007 at 4:45pm | IP Logged |
No it's not a contest. However, I see a few people here that have alot to say in terms of putting down methods when not necessarily offering methods of their own, or offering theoretical ideas of sitting around, listening and magically acquiring languages without any effort (in a non-immersed environment).
I said Tarzan speak has worked for me, and I can prove it.
I am open for anyone to test my fluency in any of the languages that I claim. Skype anyone?
However, I pose this same challenge to Linguamor as well. However, she appears to be back-tracking now and now exclaims everything I have written is 'incoherent.' Funny how she was able to reply to all of my 'incoherent' posts in this forum. So much for incoherence.
I mean afterall, if we are going to judge any methods of anyone.
Why not see how well these methods have actually worked in terms of achieving "advanced proficiency." I mean this really shouldn't be a big deal to anyone who is confident in their skills and can back up their methods.
1 person has voted this message useful
|