Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

International Phonetic Alphabet

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
94 messages over 12 pages: 1 2 3 46 7 ... 5 ... 11 12 Next >>
leosmith
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6552 days ago

2365 posts - 3804 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Tagalog

 
 Message 34 of 94
14 January 2008 at 11:22pm | IP Logged 
Zhuangzi wrote:
I do not think a Thai person needs to learn the IPA nor would get a meaningful return from learning the IPA if the goal was to learn English.English is essentially a phonetically written language, with irregularities but with a lot of patterns. The time of the learner is better spent listening to and reading English. This is not an extreme position. It is just my opinion, one that is shared with some here, and one which others, including you, disagree with. Not all views opposed to your own are "extreme".

In Thailand, IPA is the most commonly used transliteration tool to learn english. The majority of Thai english teachers and english teaching books use IPA to a certain degree to teach english. I disagree with your opinion that a Thai person would not get a meaningful return from learning IPA. The small amount of time required to learn the IPA for english is well worth it (it took me a just few hours, for example).

Because so many people use it already, and it's so ingrained and important to so many language learners, I find you "not recommending" anyone to use IPA as a language learning tool to be extreme. Sorry 'bout that.
1 person has voted this message useful



Zhuangzi
Nonaglot
Language Program Publisher
Senior Member
Canada
lingq.com
Joined 7030 days ago

646 posts - 688 votes 
Speaks: English*, French, Japanese, Swedish, Mandarin, Cantonese, German, Italian, Spanish
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 35 of 94
15 January 2008 at 12:43am | IP Logged 
I prefer to listen and will recommend the same to any learners I speak to.
1 person has voted this message useful



leosmith
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6552 days ago

2365 posts - 3804 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Tagalog

 
 Message 36 of 94
15 January 2008 at 1:28am | IP Logged 
Zhuangzi wrote:
I prefer to listen and will recommend the same to any learners I speak to.

If you used pinyin for more than just typing when you learned Mandarin, I'd say that sounds hypocritical.
1 person has voted this message useful



Zhuangzi
Nonaglot
Language Program Publisher
Senior Member
Canada
lingq.com
Joined 7030 days ago

646 posts - 688 votes 
Speaks: English*, French, Japanese, Swedish, Mandarin, Cantonese, German, Italian, Spanish
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 37 of 94
15 January 2008 at 1:43am | IP Logged 
leosmith,

I recommend the use of Pinyin or other Romanized transliteration systems for languages with a non-phonetic script. I recommend the phonetic script of the language you are learning where such a phonetic script exists.I do not use and do not recommend the IPA which is an artificial and foreign system to me. rightly or wrongly, that is what I think. I have learned quite a few languages without the IPA, how many have you learned?

I must say I find your logic strange to say the least. You seem to want to explain away the views of others as extreme or hypocritical. How about accepting that different people hold different opinions and are not just going to bend to your views.
1 person has voted this message useful



Art07
Groupie
Russian Federation
Joined 6216 days ago

61 posts - 64 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 38 of 94
15 January 2008 at 5:48am | IP Logged 
IPA is a very useful thing. If you are learning English almost all English dictionaries use IPA. It takes about 5 mintues to get familiar with IPA.

There are even programs that allow you to search a word in the dictionary based on phonetics. You type in how it sounds for you based on IPA and the program searches for the actual word or the words which are very close.

I don't see any trouble with IPA because it takes, as I said, no more then 5 mintues to get familiar with it and benifits are worth those 5 minutes. Also, other phonetic systems are very close to IPA and its idea, so knowning IPA helps in other things.

And the major benefit of IPA is that it is a standart. I would say 'the' standard for phonetic system, almost every one in some way or another knows it. So, if you are an intelegent man in linguistics, why deny IPA?

Edited by Art07 on 15 January 2008 at 5:50am

1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 94 messages over 12 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 46 7 8 9 10 11 12  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.2970 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.