Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Cristina’s way TAC 2013 TEAM MIR/SPARTA

 Language Learning Forum : Language Learning Log Post Reply
248 messages over 31 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 16 ... 30 31 Next >>
zecchino1991
Senior Member
United States
facebook.com/amyybur
Joined 5259 days ago

778 posts - 885 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Italian, Modern Hebrew, Russian, Arabic (Written), Romanian, Icelandic, Georgian

 
 Message 121 of 248
01 February 2013 at 4:52pm | IP Logged 
I think mrwarper was on the right track. But maybe it would be more accurate to say it is because it's a
conditional. For example, you could say, "When I see him kiss her, I will..." In that case it is not hypothetical (it
is definitely going to happen), but it is conditional. And to me, saying "kissing" in that case might imply a more
ongoing action (like he's making out with her), rather than one quick kiss on the cheek or something... That
doesn't mean it would be wrong to say "kissing" and mean one short kiss, I just think it would be more clear if
you said "kiss" to convey that meaning.

Edited by zecchino1991 on 01 February 2013 at 5:04pm

1 person has voted this message useful



mrwarper
Diglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
Spain
forum_posts.asp?TID=Registered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5227 days ago

1493 posts - 2500 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*, EnglishC2
Studies: German, Russian, Japanese

 
 Message 122 of 248
01 February 2013 at 5:04pm | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:
But how can it be? How are the words "man" and "kiss" connected? Kissing could be a participle (I saw you dancing). I see an unknown man to kiss someone could be acc. c. inf. (complex object). What construction is there in this sentence?

Er... delete the "nouns" bit, I was thinking of something else at the same time, so it's 'both refer to', etc. My bad.

How are 'man' and 'kiss' connected? Just the same way "man" and "kissing" are connected and you don't have a problem with it. 'Kiss' is the action you *could* see the man do (← see the same structure here?), 'kissing' is the action you *see* as/when it happens (not a big difference). You could also say 'see how a man kisses...' and it means nearly the same thing again, yet it is connected in a different way. You can think of them all as different ways of saying the same thing, each of them having its own 'formula'. BTW, the verb there is invariable just like 'kissing', i.e.: you could say 'see a man kiss...' or 'see men kiss...', 'see a man kissing...' or 'see men kissing...', but it is 'see how a man kisses...' and 'see how men kiss...'

Edit: I just saw zecchino's post -- I thought Mapk's question was the difference between 'kiss' and 'kissing' instead of how the infinitive 'kiss' can act as an object for 'see' like the gerund 'kissing' can, so I thought I'd give an example involving a similar difference in meanings in a structure *other than* the one that's posing a problem ;)
In Cristina's phrase any 'kiss' vs 'kissing' / 'infinitive object' vs 'gerund object' considerations do not affect / are not affected by conditionality.

Edited by mrwarper on 01 February 2013 at 5:15pm

1 person has voted this message useful



zecchino1991
Senior Member
United States
facebook.com/amyybur
Joined 5259 days ago

778 posts - 885 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Italian, Modern Hebrew, Russian, Arabic (Written), Romanian, Icelandic, Georgian

 
 Message 123 of 248
01 February 2013 at 5:21pm | IP Logged 
Yeah, I just relalized that I was thinking way too hard about that. You can say "see a
man kiss.." and there is no problem with that, whether it is conditional/hypothetical or
not. I'm sorry to make it more confusing than it is...haha.

However...
mrwarper wrote:
'Kiss' is the action you *could* see the man do (← see the same
structure here?), 'kissing' is the action you *see* as/when it happens (not a big
difference).

:)

Edited by zecchino1991 on 01 February 2013 at 5:32pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5057 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 124 of 248
01 February 2013 at 6:11pm | IP Logged 
mrwarper wrote:


How are 'man' and 'kiss' connected? Just the same way "man" and "kissing" are connected
and you don't have a problem with it.

But "kissing" is a partciple, thus litterally this phrase is (Если) я вижу незнакомого
мужчину целующим мою дочь... (как незнакомый мужчина целует мою дочь). The construction
"Complex Object" requires to use the infinitive with to. I know him TO be a good person,
not just "be a good person". And here the word "kiss" is used without "to". Why?
1 person has voted this message useful



tarvos
Super Polyglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
China
likeapolyglot.wordpr
Joined 4708 days ago

5310 posts - 9399 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans
Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish

 
 Message 125 of 248
01 February 2013 at 6:23pm | IP Logged 
Isn't it just a type of subjunctive?
1 person has voted this message useful



mrwarper
Diglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
Spain
forum_posts.asp?TID=Registered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5227 days ago

1493 posts - 2500 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*, EnglishC2
Studies: German, Russian, Japanese

 
 Message 126 of 248
01 February 2013 at 6:39pm | IP Logged 
@tarvos, you said that just to make someone jump in and say 'no, it's actually irrealis', didn't you? ;)

Mapk, referring me to a language I struggle with won't help me one bit to understand your question ;)
OK, seriously, I'm not sure what you mean exactly by "Complex object", but if it requires the "to" then I see why you have a problem now, and it's very interesting. Please let me check it calmly tonight, and I'll post any useful follow up as an edit here in the morning.

First edit: I found this about 'Complex object' and it sure lists this very same structure ('she made me do it' -- no 'to') at the very end, but I'm still puzzled at so many seemingly different things being put under the same category ("Complex object"), so I'll definitely have to check it thoroughly.

Second edit: I was about to comment on this 'complex object' thing a bit, but given Mapk's remark in response to Cristina a few posts down, I'll STFU.

Edited by mrwarper on 02 February 2013 at 12:08pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 5057 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 127 of 248
01 February 2013 at 6:46pm | IP Logged 
The complex object is like Latin accusativus cum infinitivo. I want you to do something,
We know him to live in London and so on.
1 person has voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4845 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 128 of 248
01 February 2013 at 7:03pm | IP Logged 
Your answer might be here.


2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 248 messages over 31 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3438 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.