116 messages over 15 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11 ... 14 15 Next >>
Michael K. Senior Member United States Joined 5727 days ago 568 posts - 886 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Spanish, Esperanto
| Message 81 of 116 18 April 2012 at 4:22pm | IP Logged |
Švejk wrote:
I sense that free discussion is not all that welcome on this forum. I am sorry if I disturbed the cozy sense of community here and will leave. |
|
|
Don't be ridiculous, Steve. Of course you're welcomed here. You have every right to discuss LingQ on the forum and answer any questions other forum members have.
We have gotten other authors on here before. The author of TYS Indonesian was on here once and interacted with us. Michael Erard, author of Babel No More has a thread where he takes part in our discussions. They didn't defend their work as much as you are, so maybe that's why you are getting a chilly reception.
3 persons have voted this message useful
|
Mae Trilingual Octoglot Pro Member Germany Joined 4989 days ago 299 posts - 499 votes Speaks: German*, SpanishC2*, Swiss-German*, FrenchC2, EnglishC2, ItalianB2, Dutch, Portuguese Studies: Russian, Swedish Personal Language Map
| Message 82 of 116 18 April 2012 at 4:51pm | IP Logged |
Švejk wrote:
If my participation here is considered barging in, then I will stop
commenting. |
|
|
Sorry, it was not intended to sound so harsh. I just felt it couldn't be very
"neutral" if the (Co-)Founder of the product in question is "correcting" things and
"defending" the product.
Švejk wrote:
You cannot have a "neutral " thread, you can only have an open and free
thread, where people express their opinions, or provide information supporting
different points of view. |
|
|
"Neutral" was meant to express an environment free from economical interests. Steve,
you are the father of LingQ, so if it was my baby in question, I couldn't write in an
absolutely impartial way. I'm not questioning that you have the right to do so.
Švejk wrote:
I felt that there were a number of inaccurate statements made about LingQ.
I provided a different perspective and different information. |
|
|
Sorry if I did inaccurate statements about my experiences with LingQ. I tried to write
what I wrote to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Švejk wrote:
I sense that free discussion is not all that welcome on this forum. I am
sorry if I disturbed the cozy sense of community here and will leave. |
|
|
Absolutely not. I never felt this way here, and everyone who has seen your videos,
Steve, knows that you have a lot to share about languages and learning. So please feel
free to do so! I just felt your position could be "biased", that's all. It is nothing
personal!!!
Edited by Mae on 18 April 2012 at 4:59pm
1 person has voted this message useful
| lwtproject Pentaglot Senior Member Netherlands https://learning-wit Joined 4890 days ago 149 posts - 264 votes Speaks: French, Dutch*, German, English, Mandarin Studies: Italian
| Message 83 of 116 18 April 2012 at 6:17pm | IP Logged |
Two days ago, I corrected two false statements about LWT that had been posted in the LingQ forum by two LingQ members. My two posts were deleted right away, and Steve/Švejk wrote later:
"I am always amazed at the chutzpah, or lack of common sense, of someone who regularly spams our forum with information about a system that he claims to be like LingQ, and who specifically encourages people to grab all the content at LingQ, contributed by our members, and take it over to his program. Shortly we will close this thread and will do so whenever this troll stops by, and this is unfortunate since it annoys our members."
In the LingQ forum there is no "open and free thread, where people express their opinions, or provide information supporting different points of view". (cit. Steve/Švejk, see above)
Taking over LingQ content to LWT is possible for every (also non-paying) LingQ member. Is it morally reprehensible to copy & paste such free resources and use it in a software other than LingQ???
I find it interesting that LWT has not been tried or tested by Steve/Švejk and his LingQ crew in order to learn how things at LingQ could be improved. LWT is the result of my dissatisfaction with LingQ. But my dissatisfaction seems to be irrelevant. The possibility to change the color of the LingQ avatar seems to have much more importance.
Edited by lwtproject on 18 April 2012 at 6:20pm
8 persons have voted this message useful
| frenkeld Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 6941 days ago 2042 posts - 2719 votes Speaks: Russian*, English Studies: German
| Message 84 of 116 18 April 2012 at 6:27pm | IP Logged |
A forum that belongs to a specific product, as opposed to an open forum like this one, probably doesn't have to be quite as open.
BTW, does LWT run on Linux?
1 person has voted this message useful
| lwtproject Pentaglot Senior Member Netherlands https://learning-wit Joined 4890 days ago 149 posts - 264 votes Speaks: French, Dutch*, German, English, Mandarin Studies: Italian
| Message 85 of 116 18 April 2012 at 6:40pm | IP Logged |
frenkeld wrote:
...does LWT run on Linux? |
|
|
Yes, of course. Just set up Apache, PHP and MySQL (see here for Ubuntu), and extract LWT into Apache's DocumentRoot. Make sure that Apache is able to access LWT files (via chmod/chown).
1 person has voted this message useful
| Arekkusu Hexaglot Senior Member Canada bit.ly/qc_10_lec Joined 5379 days ago 3971 posts - 7747 votes Speaks: English, French*, GermanC1, Spanish, Japanese, Esperanto Studies: Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Estonian
| Message 86 of 116 18 April 2012 at 7:11pm | IP Logged |
Michael K. wrote:
Švejk wrote:
I sense that free discussion is not all that welcome on this forum. I am sorry if I disturbed the cozy sense of community here and will leave. |
|
|
Don't be ridiculous, Steve. Of course you're welcomed here. You have every right to discuss LingQ on the forum and answer any questions other forum members have. |
|
|
It was not unreasonable to expect that Steve would want to justify his product and clarify misconceptions about it. Most of us would do the same. We can leave that argument to rest.
Steve is no doubt a passionate man, and his passion for both language learning and Lingq is obvious. HTLAL would certainly benefit from his more active participation here, even if the discussion may at times become more heated as it gets more passionate. A man who has accomplished so much with languages and who has actually bothered to create a system, and to record numerous videos, aimed at helping people learn languages and encouraging them to do so is a valuable asset to any language forum -- and to this one most of all.
I do find it unfortunate, however, that this passion is occasionally, in forums or videos, perceived as somewhat vitriolic by some members. I know Steve to be a much more reasonable man than some find him to be from his posts alone.
Steve, I’d be really disappointed if this thread drove you away. Let’s all concentrate on sharing our common passion despite all potential disagreements. It's when we disagree that we learn the most.
Edited by Arekkusu on 18 April 2012 at 7:13pm
12 persons have voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6595 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 87 of 116 18 April 2012 at 7:52pm | IP Logged |
Švejk wrote:
Serpent wrote:
Intensive and extensive reading are established terms on this forum. |
|
|
I can assure you that my opinions will not be constrained by any established dogma at this forum, but will reflect my own views. |
|
|
Oh sure, I just meant that you called them subjective terms but they aren't. I repeat, you've been gone for years and you probably haven't read any of the topics we've had on intensive vs extensive reading.
There's no established dogma here btw. Just some things that are common knowledge, such as what CEFR is, who Mezzofanti, ProfArguelles and Benny are, what the base language of most Assimil courses is...
Also, I'm not sure the LWT posts annoy anyone but you and trolling is a completely different concept. Frankly, this "they claim to be as good as we are" thing reminds me on HP and blood purity.
Edited by Serpent on 18 April 2012 at 8:02pm
6 persons have voted this message useful
| tmp011007 Diglot Senior Member Congo Joined 6067 days ago 199 posts - 346 votes Speaks: Spanish*, English Studies: French, Portuguese
| Message 88 of 116 18 April 2012 at 9:05pm | IP Logged |
Serpent wrote:
Just some things that are common knowledge, such as what CEFR is, who Mezzofanti, ProfArguelles and Benny are, what the base language of most Assimil courses is... |
|
|
of course. now, one of the "guys" you've just mentioned seems to have no idea what CEFR is (a little clue? it's neither the dead one, nor the philologist one)
Serpent wrote:
Also, I'm not sure the LWT posts annoy anyone but you and trolling is a completely different concept. |
|
|
I wouldn't say "trolling" but "spamming"
1 person has voted this message useful
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.3438 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|