11 messages over 2 pages: 1 2
YnEoS Senior Member United States Joined 4256 days ago 472 posts - 893 votes Speaks: English* Studies: German, Russian, Cantonese, Japanese, French, Hungarian, Czech, Swedish, Mandarin, Italian, Spanish
| Message 9 of 11 05 March 2014 at 6:30pm | IP Logged |
I highly recommend using both. If you get too stressed out trying to maintain a routine with each, you might also using one as your main study tool, and the other for more casual practice (just work with the audio a few times, read through it don't worry about remembering everything). This will allow you to re-encounter vocabulary in new contexts and review certain grammar points without much stress.
Edited by YnEoS on 05 March 2014 at 7:01pm
1 person has voted this message useful
| luke Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 7207 days ago 3133 posts - 4351 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Esperanto, French
| Message 10 of 11 05 March 2014 at 8:06pm | IP Logged |
markmsb wrote:
On another note I actually was given French without Toil from 1940 by a friend. Do you
believe it would be worth using that in conjunction with the newer French with Ease? |
|
|
I used New French with Ease, French Without Toil, and Using French simultaneously. It does get to be a bit
much when there are multiple waves going in NFWE and FWT at the same time. I didn't do "active waves",
but I would use the "active wave" as a review wave.
For me, using multiple Assimil courses was good for variety. I can see the benefit of focusing on one course
at a time too. I'm also a believer in continuing to review the courses and continuing to other resources and
native materials as you progress. Over time, the Assimil courses get less time and weight, but as long as you
feel you are still getting value from using the courses, it's a signpost of your progress. What was once
challenging becomes easy.
1 person has voted this message useful
| markmsb Newbie United States Joined 3920 days ago 16 posts - 20 votes Speaks: English*
| Message 11 of 11 05 March 2014 at 8:20pm | IP Logged |
I looked at French without Toil and it seems like the earlier lessons are slightly more difficult to understand in terms of question and statement order. For example: They teach avons-nous nous-avons inversion form without touching on est-ce que. Is this a more modern way of speaking and writing?
1 person has voted this message useful
|
This discussion contains 11 messages over 2 pages: << Prev 1 2 If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.1875 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|