Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Chinese will rule the World Wide Web

  Tags: Internet | Mandarin
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
121 messages over 16 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 11 ... 15 16 Next >>
sipes23
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
pluteopleno.com/wprs
Joined 4871 days ago

134 posts - 235 votes 
Speaks: English*, Latin
Studies: Spanish, Ancient Greek, Persian

 
 Message 81 of 121
09 August 2011 at 4:47am | IP Logged 
nway wrote:
Pinyin isn't used as the main written system for Mandarin due to voluntary cultural preference, not
some "innate" linguistic limitation.


True, I was probably too close to anthropomorphizing there. There is no inherent reason the Mandarin community
can't switch, but I really doubt they would.
1 person has voted this message useful



Spanky
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5957 days ago

1021 posts - 1714 votes 
Studies: French

 
 Message 83 of 121
09 August 2011 at 5:49am | IP Logged 
sipes23 wrote:
nway wrote:
Pinyin isn't used as the main written system for
Mandarin due to voluntary cultural preference, not
some "innate" linguistic limitation.


True, I was probably too close to anthropomorphizing there. There is no inherent reason
the Mandarin community
can't switch, but I really doubt they would.


Hopefully you were not too close to anthropomorphizing: " attributing human
characteristics (or characteristics assumed to belong only to humans) to non-human
animals..."!!   



1 person has voted this message useful



lichtrausch
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5961 days ago

525 posts - 1072 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Japanese
Studies: Korean, Mandarin

 
 Message 84 of 121
09 August 2011 at 5:48pm | IP Logged 
paranday wrote:

I wonder if the Vietnamese people will ever choose to revert back to characters? Not sure I'd call their present system ugly, but I won't be putting a Chữ Quốc Ngữ wall hanging up as decoration any time soon.

I can imagine a niche community of intellectuals reverting to using characters for literature and calligraphy. But it would take some kind of revolution for the masses to go back to it.
1 person has voted this message useful



fiziwig
Senior Member
United States
Joined 4866 days ago

297 posts - 618 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 86 of 121
10 August 2011 at 12:04am | IP Logged 
nway wrote:
2. Grammar. In English, I am; you or they are; and he or she is. In Chinese, I 是; you or they 是; and he or she 是. In English, I eat; I ate; and I will eat. In Chinese, I 吃; I 吃; and I 吃. In English, I can; I could; and I will be able to. In Chinese, I 可以; I 可以; and I 可以. Suffice to say, grammar is just as important as spelling, and Chinese clearly has the edge here.


I don't see how it's an advantage to bundle so many distinct semantic concepts into a single symbol. Doesn't that make it impossible for Chinese to have the same expressive precision of English or Spanish? What you seem to be implying is that English could gain that same edge by discarding all verb tenses. How does throwing away a useful grammatical tool give a language an edge?

As for writing, the Chinese may, in fact dominate the economy of the future, but it's certainly not going to happen unless and until they scrap their ridiculous writing system for some kind of alphabetic system.

--gary
1 person has voted this message useful



Mandira
Triglot
Newbie
Norway
Joined 4875 days ago

8 posts - 8 votes
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, German
Studies: Mandarin

 
 Message 87 of 121
10 August 2011 at 1:40am | IP Logged 
fiziwig wrote:

As for writing, the Chinese may, in fact dominate the economy of the future, but it's certainly not going to happen unless and until they scrap their ridiculous writing system for some kind of alphabetic system.


I wouldn't hold my breath. The PRC government once aimed to replace the characters with pinyin as the official writing system, but decided in the end that it wasn't such a good idea after all. Personally I believe that if Chinese should become more widely learnt among foreigners, perhaps even a lingua franca; Chinese learners are likely to write in pinyin among each other, both as a result of tecnical limitations and in order to reach a public not literate using hanzi. Such a development would of course make pinyin more prevalent.
1 person has voted this message useful



nway
Senior Member
United States
youtube.com/user/Vic
Joined 5416 days ago

574 posts - 1707 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean

 
 Message 88 of 121
10 August 2011 at 3:52am | IP Logged 
fiziwig wrote:
I don't see how it's an advantage to bundle so many distinct semantic concepts into a single symbol. Doesn't that make it impossible for Chinese to have the same expressive precision of English or Spanish? What you seem to be implying is that English could gain that same edge by discarding all verb tenses. How does throwing away a useful grammatical tool give a language an edge?

As for writing, the Chinese may, in fact dominate the economy of the future, but it's certainly not going to happen unless and until they scrap their ridiculous writing system for some kind of alphabetic system.

--gary

You seem to be under the false assumption that "expressive precision" is a key component of a lingua franca. There's a reason why phonetically simpler Mandarin and the grammatically simpler Indonesian had such success at becoming lingua francas of their respective multilingual nations.

Moreover, Chinese can be incredibly expressive, but it achieves this idiomatically rather than grammatically. As for being "precise", I'm assuming you mean "concise", because any language used correctly will inevitably be precise. And with respect to being concise, it's well-known that written Chinese takes far less space than English to express the same content.

Their "ridiculous writing system" has unified over one billion people with a history of cultural and linguistic diversity akin to that of modern-day Europe, and it has persisted for well over two millennia.

Considering the European languages using the Latin alphabet have done nothing but perpetually splinter apart from each other throughout the ages, perhaps there's something to be appreciated about the enduring and unifying force of the Chinese writing system, no?


4 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 121 messages over 16 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3203 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.