Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Chinese will rule the World Wide Web

  Tags: Internet | Mandarin
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
121 messages over 16 pages: 1 2 3 4 57 ... 6 ... 15 16 Next >>
lichtrausch
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5961 days ago

525 posts - 1072 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Japanese
Studies: Korean, Mandarin

 
 Message 41 of 121
17 July 2011 at 8:20am | IP Logged 
Fiveonefive wrote:
Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan have not been innovating themselves. Compared to the west that is.

Could you be any more wrong?

The Economist writes:

""Because Japan's population is only 42 percent of that of the U.S., its ratio of patents per million population is 3.5 times higher than the United States — and indeed the highest such ratio of all," a report on the study states."

http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nb20070517a1.html


I mean really, how do you think Japan has built up wildly successful multinational companies that are constantly bringing out newer, better products with global appeal?

Unless you have some really solid evidence you should stop making such extreme claims.
3 persons have voted this message useful



Fiveonefive
Diglot
Groupie
Japan
Joined 5694 days ago

69 posts - 88 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: Swedish

 
 Message 42 of 121
17 July 2011 at 8:52am | IP Logged 
lichtrausch wrote:

Could you be any more wrong?

The Economist writes:


No I'm not wrong, please hear me out.

The enormous number of Japanese patents is not a reliable indicator of where they stand internationally in terms of genuine innovation. Particularly when the systems differ as they do between Japan and the US. Patents in general are a bad indicator of innovation. Among the problems are...

1. The importance of patents varies enormously among industries. If country A is strong in a field where patents are important and country B is strong in a field where other forms of intellectual protection are important, A will appear to look better than B without being more innovative.

2. The US system favors multiple claims for a single patent. Tthe Japanese system favors separate patents for each claim. An invention with multiple uses might generate one patent in the US but five or six in Japan.

3. Japanese companies use patents as an employee performance indicator. This leads to the filing of applications for trivial innovations that companies in other countries would never bother with. There is an interesting book by Niall Murtagh called Blue-Eyed Salaryman that describes this patten in Japan from a foreigner's perspective.

4. Japanese companies build up patent portfolios as bargaining chips to get international licensing arrangements with foreign firms.

5. Japanese law allows for patents in certain areas that US law does not.

Edited by Fiveonefive on 17 July 2011 at 9:10am

1 person has voted this message useful



Fiveonefive
Diglot
Groupie
Japan
Joined 5694 days ago

69 posts - 88 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: Swedish

 
 Message 43 of 121
17 July 2011 at 9:09am | IP Logged 

And

6. Many patents are filed by corporations and individuals from outside Japan, just as many Japanese corporations and individuals file for patents in the US, EU, and China. Most major corporations will file for patents in numerous countries, but as a minimum, those three markets and the manufacturing location are critical.

So any of these patents could be Apple Computer trying to protect its intellectual property in the Japanese market. Or could also be Honda Jet, who conducts R&D in North Carolina and employees mostly US engineers, securing its patents back home in Japan. And even though a critical engine component could be completely designed in the US, it might fetch as many as 5 patents in Japan, 3 in Taiwan, and only 1 in the US.
1 person has voted this message useful



nway
Senior Member
United States
youtube.com/user/Vic
Joined 5416 days ago

574 posts - 1707 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean

 
 Message 44 of 121
17 July 2011 at 9:14am | IP Logged 
Fiveonefive wrote:
I'm talking about innovation and you respond with a whole bunch of spam about how many electric cars (might) get sold in China and how large their broadband service is going to be.

First off, this thread isn't even about innovation. It's about the Chinese language's prospects of overtaking English as a second language. There's more to this than one ambiguous variable of future "innovation". After all, there's been even less innovation in Latin America and Spain than China, and yet Spanish enjoys immense popularity as a second language — blows your mind, eh?

Fiveonefive wrote:
prevent China from being the country that invents something like broadband , the electric car, spaceflight, air flight, computers, atomic energy, and so on.

Let me, if I may, quote the historian Will Durant:

Quote:
"Civilization is not something inborn or imperishable; it must be acquired anew by every generation, and any serious interruption in its financing or its transmission may bring it to an end. Man differs from the beast only by education, which may be defined as the technique of transmitting civilization."
— Will Durant, 1935

All those innovations you cite are the legacies of past generations. Perhaps it's because I'm younger and thus have firsthand experience with college students getting shitfaced to dubstep while buzzed off hookah and high on Adderall, but let's just say I don't have a lot of faith in my generation after having attended one of America's "elite" universities.

Fiveonefive wrote:
They can't even invent the technology to keep the free flow of information suppressed on that broadband you touted...

Alternatively, Mr. Sino-Pessimist, this can be interpreted as Chinese youth being innovative enough to be able to outmaneuver a government capable of pulling off the kind of economic results in all those "spam" charts I posted above. How many "sophisticated cyber-hacking attacks" does China need to successfully pull off against the U.S. military before getting its rep as sufficiently innovative? Is it because they haven't invented the Snuggie and Crocs?

Anyway, this thread is about non-Chinese people learning Chinese, so here's a relevant little news item pertaining to just that:

Quote:
CHINESE TO BE TAUGHT IN ALL SWEDISH SCHOOLS: EDUCATION MINISTER
Jul 06, 2011

STOCKHOLM. Within a decade, all Swedish primary schools should offer Chinese lessons, Sweden’s education minister was quoted as saying today, insisting the move was needed to improve competitiveness.

“I want to see Sweden become the first country in Europe to introduce instruction in Chinese as a foreign language at all primary and secondary schools,” said Jan Bjoerklund, who heads the Progress Party, a junior member of the centre-right ruling coalition.

Getting Swedish pupils to learn Chinese was vital to strengthening Swedish competitiveness, the education minister told financial daily Dagens Industri.

“Not everyone in the business world speaks English.

Very highly qualified activities are leaving Europe to move to China. Chinese will be much more important from an economic point of view than French or Spanish,” he said.

English is today the main foreign language taught in Swedish schools, followed by Spanish, German and French.

Bjoerklund acknowledged that such a move would demand a lot of resources, especially for recruiting educators who can teach Chinese, but said that within a decade all primary schools should be equipped to teach the language.

I had earlier stated that this tilt toward Chinese would not take place in Europe. Looks like I was wrong — oh, I'm so embarrassed. :)
3 persons have voted this message useful



Fiveonefive
Diglot
Groupie
Japan
Joined 5694 days ago

69 posts - 88 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: Swedish

 
 Message 45 of 121
17 July 2011 at 9:53am | IP Logged 
Not sure if you noticed it or not but parasitius made a post about Chinese innovation way back on page 2 that you happily responded to. Since then we've been arguing about different things. I was continuing the point that parasitius was making.

And you missed my point about the Chinese government not having the IT skills to suppress their internet. The point wasn't about Chinese kids getting around it but the fact that the Chinese government doesn't have the domestic technology to do it in the first place and has to buy the technology from the US, which embarrassingly provides it...



1 person has voted this message useful



strummer
Diglot
Newbie
Switzerland
Joined 4923 days ago

38 posts - 53 votes 
Speaks: Italian*, English
Studies: German, Mandarin, Japanese

 
 Message 46 of 121
17 July 2011 at 11:51am | IP Logged 
but what about global warming? the millions of chinese children born with malformations due to chemicals released in waters? what about the too big population?

im ignorant in economy but seems like these economic forecast are made without taking into consideration the global warming and the environmental problems.

China doesnt have the bright future that economists foresee, cause yes if use see only the economic data everything is great but what about the environment factor???

Watch the 2004 world bank report, china is soon to face a water crysis due to global warming and pollution of waters due to industrial chemicals.



Edited by strummer on 17 July 2011 at 11:52am

1 person has voted this message useful



HenryMW
Tetraglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5175 days ago

125 posts - 179 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Spanish, French
Studies: Modern Hebrew

 
 Message 47 of 121
17 July 2011 at 3:18pm | IP Logged 
I'm a little reluctant to post because of how this thread has wandered, but I feel some things need clearing up.

Nway:

Your post with all the inlines was interesting. No one is doubting China's size. In fact, it's the only reason why anyone cares about the country. I'm studying for exams right now, so I can't make a detailed post, but I'll point out a few things.

You claim American universities are weak because of the high level of foreign students? Really? REALLY? That is just a case of people voting with their feet. How many Americans go to China for a world class education? How many Chinese come to America? Good national universities recruit nationally. Good world universities recruit globally. The fact that these global universities are still mostly American is telling. Our mean math and reading scores might be low, but that is more of a symptom of the failure of our education system at the bottom. Our good high schools are very good.

Vehicle sales. Nevermind I bet the Chinese definition of a car differs from ours (I read an interesting article a while ago about how the Chinese inflate the number of "engineers" they graduate every year including graduates from trade schools), no one is denying the scale of China. And I bet their electric cars are as subsidized and silly as ours. Good job, your government is even more economic illiterate than mine.

Broadband providers. Yeah, I bet a large centralized government that takes an active hand in the economy totally didn't just decide to have a few small players over a bunch of small ones. What does that even mean?

And using self-reported numbers is pretty weak. In the West where we have independent media, there is an incentive to drum up problems. It's gets people watching. A state-controlled media is always going to tell you that's just rain on your boots.

And I went to one of those "elite" American universities, too. People like to have fun, no doubt, but when push came to shove, they got their work done and got into competitive graduate programs. The loud people always stand out and aren't necessarily indicative of anything more than that.

Mr. Sino-Pessimist? What is that?
3 persons have voted this message useful



nway
Senior Member
United States
youtube.com/user/Vic
Joined 5416 days ago

574 posts - 1707 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Japanese, Korean

 
 Message 48 of 121
17 July 2011 at 9:05pm | IP Logged 
I don't know why I keep responding to all these empty claims based on clichéd misguided arguments and wishful gloom-and-doom speculative forecasts (seriously? Global warming? As if that were a concern unique to China? There's a reason it's called "global warming", and not "China warming"), but I'll play along, against my better judgement.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 121 messages over 16 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 57 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 4.2266 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.