Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

How to upgrade Assimil Le Coréen

  Tags: Korean | Assimil
 Language Learning Forum : Language Programs, Books & Tapes Post Reply
13 messages over 2 pages: 1 2  Next >>
Everything
Diglot
Groupie
France
Joined 4699 days ago

87 posts - 167 votes 
Speaks: French*, English
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 1 of 13
17 February 2012 at 9:09pm | IP Logged 
BEFORE












...

AFTER











CONGRATULATIONS !


3 persons have voted this message useful



kerateo
Triglot
Senior Member
Mexico
Joined 5644 days ago

112 posts - 180 votes 
Speaks: Spanish*, English, French
Studies: Italian

 
 Message 2 of 13
17 February 2012 at 9:31pm | IP Logged 
Isn´t this known to be the worst Assimil course ever?
1 person has voted this message useful



Everything
Diglot
Groupie
France
Joined 4699 days ago

87 posts - 167 votes 
Speaks: French*, English
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 3 of 13
18 February 2012 at 8:16am | IP Logged 
Yeah, that's what the legend says.

Edited by Everything on 18 February 2012 at 3:18pm

1 person has voted this message useful



flydream777
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6489 days ago

77 posts - 102 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, French
Studies: German, Russian, Portuguese, Mandarin, Greek, Hungarian, Armenian, Irish, Italian

 
 Message 4 of 13
18 February 2012 at 5:18pm | IP Logged 
So.... Whats the point of this thread? Are you saying that assimil shouldn't use any romanization? I foresee
problems with that...
1 person has voted this message useful



Everything
Diglot
Groupie
France
Joined 4699 days ago

87 posts - 167 votes 
Speaks: French*, English
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 5 of 13
18 February 2012 at 7:53pm | IP Logged 
That's what I'm trying to say.

As you can see, romanizations are bigger than the korean words. I'll not offend anyone by
saying you must avoid romanizations and it's best to learn the korean alphabet. So,
thanks to my upgrade, now I can focus on the korean words.

I don't understand why Assimil still uses romanizations or such transcripts. It may have
been useful 20 years ago but nowadays, it doesn't make sense.
1 person has voted this message useful



flydream777
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6489 days ago

77 posts - 102 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, French
Studies: German, Russian, Portuguese, Mandarin, Greek, Hungarian, Armenian, Irish, Italian

 
 Message 6 of 13
19 February 2012 at 2:04am | IP Logged 
I'm still not following. I agree that it takes up a lot of room on the page, but how else would you learn Hangul?
You'd have to be constantly flipping back and forth to the alphabet part at the front of the book... Why 20 yrs
ago but not today?

Edit: haven't used Korean, but most assimil books start fading out the romanization like 50-75 lessons in. Did
they skip that with Korean?

Edited by flydream777 on 19 February 2012 at 2:07am

2 persons have voted this message useful



Warp3
Senior Member
United States
forum_posts.asp?TID=
Joined 5533 days ago

1419 posts - 1766 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Korean, Japanese

 
 Message 7 of 13
19 February 2012 at 3:38am | IP Logged 
In my opinion, romanization (especially in Korean, which has many sound pairs/triplets that simply do not romanize well) is a very unhealthy crutch and the faster you shed it the better. Some of the words I still have trouble spelling are ones that I mentally spelled using English lettering before I learned how the Korean spelling went (since I started with Pimsleur which insists on not including written dialogs as it "is contrary to the method").

I actively avoided romanization from the start in my Korean studies and I have zero regrets about it due to the payoffs it has brought (mostly notably in my 한글 reading and typing speed). In fact, a short while back I noticed that my reading and typing speed for romanized Korean was absolutely horrendous while my reading and typing speed for 한글 is not all that far off from English now. Since Korean media very rarely uses romanized text (and when it does it is almost always a proper noun), I'll gladly take that trade off.
2 persons have voted this message useful



Everything
Diglot
Groupie
France
Joined 4699 days ago

87 posts - 167 votes 
Speaks: French*, English
Studies: Spanish

 
 Message 8 of 13
19 February 2012 at 10:58am | IP Logged 
Quote:
I'm still not following. I agree that it takes up a lot of room on the page, but
how else would you learn Hangul?
You'd have to be constantly flipping back and forth to the alphabet part at the front of
the book... Why 20 yrs
ago but not today?


Because today, all Assimil books come with audio files. Learning Hangul should be the
first step in your learning plan and there is absolutely not necessary to use
romanization.

For example :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QeOoZU6t2ek


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 13 messages over 2 pages: 2  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 2.3750 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.