Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Do alphabets need to be so complicated?

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
115 messages over 15 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13 ... 14 15 Next >>
lichtrausch
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5961 days ago

525 posts - 1072 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Japanese
Studies: Korean, Mandarin

 
 Message 97 of 115
24 October 2010 at 8:10pm | IP Logged 
fireflies wrote:
   I have heard and read so much about how we should learn Mandarin
and how it will be an important language of the future.

Mandarin will become a must for well-educated East Asians. For the rest of the world,
not so much.

Quote:

I don't think that everyone in China should have to learn English either. We are living
in an age in which the mysteries of foreign cultures are being unravelled and discussed
in English; a language that no longer has any mystery to a staggering number of people
in the world. English is everyone's language these days and that is sometimes
disheartening in some ways. There is probably some value in not allowing a language to
become a global language because it tends to lose some of its culture in the process.

English is extremely far from being "everyone's language". For example, your average
person on the street in East Asia can still not communicate in English. Don't be fooled
by all the statistics of hundreds of millions of Chinese learning English. It's true
that they are trying to learn English, but only a fraction of them reach proficiency in
the language.
1 person has voted this message useful



fireflies
Senior Member
Joined 5182 days ago

172 posts - 234 votes 
Speaks: English*

 
 Message 98 of 115
24 October 2010 at 8:48pm | IP Logged 
lichtrausch wrote:
 English is extremely far from being "everyone's language". For example, your average
person on the street in East Asia can still not communicate in English. Don't be fooled
by all the statistics of hundreds of millions of Chinese learning English. It's true
that they are trying to learn English, but only a fraction of them reach proficiency in
the language.

The people who travel between China and the West for business should know both languages. It doesn't make much sense for everyone else to know both unless they have the desire to learn and a lot of time.


1 person has voted this message useful



clumsy
Octoglot
Senior Member
Poland
lang-8.com/6715Registered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5179 days ago

1116 posts - 1367 votes 
Speaks: Polish*, English, Japanese, Korean, French, Mandarin, Italian, Vietnamese
Studies: Spanish, Arabic (Written), Swedish
Studies: Danish, Dari, Kirundi

 
 Message 99 of 115
25 October 2010 at 11:55am | IP Logged 
Qinshi wrote:
clumsy wrote:
I have just checked the Harry Potter on online bookshop.
English version = 300 pages
Chinese version = less than 200
Chinese writting is much more concise.


You do realise that Chinese uses characters? Characters are more bunched up together. Compare, for example:

Today is my friend's birthday.
vs
今天是我朋友的生日。
vs
Hôm nay là [ngày] sinh nhật của bạn tôi

And that's a benefit of different scripts.


1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6012 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 100 of 115
25 October 2010 at 1:15pm | IP Logged 
clumsy wrote:
Qinshi wrote:
clumsy wrote:
I have just checked the Harry Potter on online bookshop.
English version = 300 pages
Chinese version = less than 200
Chinese writting is much more concise.


You do realise that Chinese uses characters? Characters are more bunched up together. Compare, for example:

Today is my friend's birthday.
vs
今天是我朋友的生日。
vs
Hôm nay là [ngày] sinh nhật của bạn tôi

And that's a benefit of different scripts.

Yup, as I said, Chinese stayed pictographic because they wrote on scrolls and space was at a premium. Mediterranean languages went alphabetical because of the invention of the codex, so space wasn't as important.
1 person has voted this message useful



Cthulhu
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 7224 days ago

139 posts - 235 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Mandarin, Russian

 
 Message 101 of 115
25 October 2010 at 4:41pm | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:

Yup, as I said, Chinese stayed pictographic because they wrote on scrolls and space was at a premium. Mediterranean languages went alphabetical because of the invention of the codex, so space wasn't as important.


Just so we're clear, the Greek and Roman alphabets predate the invention of the codex by many, many centuries. Furthermore the Chinese have been using books or book-like things for a really long time now as well. Actually, since the West was using papyrus (Expensive to import and useless for storage in damp climates.) and mammal-skins (Expensive and limited in potential supply) while the Chinese used cheap and relatively easy to produce paper (Or prior to that, bamboo strips) for the bulk of their writing, I would argue that space was at even more of a premium for those Mediterranean languages and their long-winded alphabets.

Since I'm already here, I might as well say that I suspect the reason why the Chinese writing system is as complicated as it is, is because it's still used by the Chinese. Nothing more, nothing less. The Latin alphabet is the miracle of simplicity that it is (Regardless of English's own absurd orthography) because it's an adaptation of an adaptation of an adaptation of an adaptation of a writing system every bit as complicated as Chinese (In this case, Ancient Egyptian). Over the process of adapting the structures of writing to new, different languages the writing systems produced became simpler and simpler.
Meanwhile, while the Chinese language both written and spoken has changed enormously since their own invention of writing, there's never been a clean break; no population replacement, no extended dark ages that saw people forgetting how to read and write, no conquest by another group with enough cultural clout to dominate (Or even resist being dominated by) the native Chinese culture, etc etc. Just millennium after millennium of Chinese people writing Chinese.
Practical reasons like space have nothing to do with it, and impractical reasons like keeping people ignorant even less. Any sort of cost/benefit analysis at all is missing the point; it's more about momentum than anything else. (I think momentum is the right word, but I've never been great with the sciences...Objects in motion tending to stay in motion unless operated on by a sufficient force? Or am I making that up? I checked Wikipedia but there were formulae and my eyes started glossing over)
5 persons have voted this message useful



Ari
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Norway
Joined 6583 days ago

2314 posts - 5695 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Mandarin, Cantonese
Studies: Czech, Latin, German

 
 Message 102 of 115
25 October 2010 at 4:50pm | IP Logged 
Cthulhu wrote:
(I think momentum is the right word, but I've never been great with the sciences...Objects in motion tending to stay in motion unless operated on by a sufficient force? Or am I making that up? I checked Wikipedia but there were formulae and my eyes started glossing over)

I think the word you're looking for is 'inertia'.

Good analysis, by the way. I agree.
1 person has voted this message useful



Cthulhu
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 7224 days ago

139 posts - 235 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Mandarin, Russian

 
 Message 103 of 115
26 October 2010 at 4:40am | IP Logged 
Ari wrote:

I think the word you're looking for is 'inertia'.

Good analysis, by the way. I agree.


Thank you, yes, inertia's exactly the concept I was looking for.
1 person has voted this message useful



Old Chemist
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5174 days ago

227 posts - 285 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German

 
 Message 104 of 115
26 October 2010 at 3:15pm | IP Logged 
You remind me of how you can apply physical and chemical principles even to complex things like large groups of people. There is one I particularly like, Le Chatelier's Principle which states that a system acts so as to minimize the effects of a change - compress a gas and it soon gets hard to decrease the volume further. To apply this to groups of people and languages, think of the invasion of a country: at first the invaders' culture and language dominate, then the original language usually makes a come-back in an altered form, for example Norman French vs. English. Of course there are exceptions to this, such as the almost complete supplanting of the Celtic languages in the West of Europe by Latin, but even here some words have survived. I wonder if some genius will sometime establish explanations for linguistic change in scientific terms. Grimm's law and the like are not explanations,of course, they are purely descriptive albeit useful.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 115 messages over 15 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.5781 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.