Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Beginning Russian Advice?

  Tags: Beginner | Russian
 Language Learning Forum : Advice Center Post Reply
70 messages over 9 pages: 13 4 5 6 7 ... 2 ... 8 9 Next >>
Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 4861 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 9 of 70
09 April 2012 at 2:15pm | IP Logged 
fabriciocarraro wrote:
In my opinion, the best book for Russian I've found so far is
"The New Penguin Russian Course". It doesn't have many exercises, but it's divided in 30
lessons, each one giving you some aspect of Russian grammar in a very didatic way, and
there are also many texts. I love it! =)

But the spelling and the pronunciation are explained in a wrong and nonsense way. And the
transcription is stupid and misleading.
And it is not very deep.

Edited by Марк on 09 April 2012 at 2:20pm

1 person has voted this message useful



fabriciocarraro
Hexaglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
Brazil
russoparabrasileirosRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4520 days ago

989 posts - 1454 votes 
Speaks: Portuguese*, EnglishB2, Italian, Spanish, Russian, French
Studies: Dutch, German, Japanese

 
 Message 10 of 70
09 April 2012 at 3:38pm | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:
fabriciocarraro wrote:
In my opinion, the best book for Russian I've found so far is
"The New Penguin Russian Course". It doesn't have many exercises, but it's divided in 30
lessons, each one giving you some aspect of Russian grammar in a very didatic way, and
there are also many texts. I love it! =)

But the spelling and the pronunciation are explained in a wrong and nonsense way. And the
transcription is stupid and misleading.
And it is not very deep.


I'll have to disagree. Since you're Russian, you don't know how it is for us foreigners to learn the transliterations by ourselves. It's given me a solid basis, both in terms of learning the alphabet, and especially in the grammar subjects, which are REALLY well explained, with a lot of details. It's VERY deep, if you learn the extras.

Since I'm not, nor want to be a linguist, for a "regular" language learner it's the best material for Russian I've come across so far.

The cons, as I said, are the lack of exercises and audio, what must be compensated with L-R, or watching movies, etc etc...

Edited by fabriciocarraro on 09 April 2012 at 3:39pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6402 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 11 of 70
09 April 2012 at 3:51pm | IP Logged 
As for Cyrillics, I'm sure I've seen it taught in the form of a linguistic enigma here http://http://www.learnlangs.com but I can't find it anymore:(
1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 4861 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 12 of 70
09 April 2012 at 4:00pm | IP Logged 
fabriciocarraro wrote:

I'll have to disagree. Since you're Russian, you don't know how it is for us foreigners
to learn the transliterations by ourselves.

You disagree that the transliteration is stupid there? But one and the same phonem is
written in different ways. For example soft consonants are marked by Y in several
positions, by ' - in other, by nothing - in other. If пя is pya, what is пья? pyya?
Why is "y" used for palatalization, if it is already used for [j]? To mislead
foreigners?
If vowel reduction is marked, why aren't shown its levels? Is a poststressed и a ee
sound like in meet? By no means. It is a shirt and unclear sound, fully determined by
surrounding consonants.
It's written: there is a spelling rule: letters ы, я, ю are not spelled after sibilants
and velars, but nothing is said how do we have to PRONOUNCE it. It is described as if
Russian was a dead language. ши and ки are entirely different situations, and there is
no such rule about the velars. The vowels are spelt after the velars according to the
general Russian rules of graphics and reflect the pronunciation, and how will I
pronounce ткёт, Гюго, Кяхта etc?
And no explanation of pronunciation at all.
3 persons have voted this message useful



fabriciocarraro
Hexaglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
Brazil
russoparabrasileirosRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4520 days ago

989 posts - 1454 votes 
Speaks: Portuguese*, EnglishB2, Italian, Spanish, Russian, French
Studies: Dutch, German, Japanese

 
 Message 13 of 70
09 April 2012 at 4:16pm | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:

You disagree that the transliteration is stupid there? But one and the same phonem is
written in different ways. For example soft consonants are marked by Y in several
positions, by ' - in other, by nothing - in other. If пя is pya, what is пья? pyya?
Why is "y" used for palatalization, if it is already used for [j]? To mislead
foreigners?
If vowel reduction is marked, why aren't shown its levels? Is a poststressed и a ee
sound like in meet? By no means. It is a shirt and unclear sound, fully determined by
surrounding consonants.
It's written: there is a spelling rule: letters ы, я, ю are not spelled after sibilants
and velars, but nothing is said how do we have to PRONOUNCE it. It is described as if
Russian was a dead language. ши and ки are entirely different situations, and there is
no such rule about the velars. The vowels are spelt after the velars according to the
general Russian rules of graphics and reflect the pronunciation, and how will I
pronounce ткёт, Гюго, Кяхта etc?
And no explanation of pronunciation at all.


The ь is always (as far as I remember) put as a little ý on the top, like a ². In the example you gave, пя is trascripted as "pya" and пья as "p²ya" (where ² is a ý, which I don't know how to put right now).

About "и" and "ee", how else would you put for a regular language learner? 99% of those who learn Russian are not linguists and are not familiar with fonetic terms. I don't know and don't want to know anything about technical terms like palatalization, verlars, etc. The closest sound in English to the Russian "и" is usually (not always) the "ee" sound. That's how you explain this to a new learner, and here comes the point where I must agree with you.
As I said before, there's no audio, therefore as far as pronunciation and listening comprehension are concerned, the course is indeed very poor, and that's exactly why I told people to try Michel Thomas first and then the book, or to search for other audio methods such as L-R, watching movies, etc.

In my personal case, I started using "The New Penguin Russian Course" alone, and only after 6 months I went to my university look for Russian classes, and my Russian pronunciation was just as good (and sometimes better) than the other "Level 2" students, so I must give it to "The New Penguin Russian Course".

Edited by fabriciocarraro on 09 April 2012 at 5:00pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Марк
Senior Member
Russian Federation
Joined 4861 days ago

2096 posts - 2972 votes 
Speaks: Russian*

 
 Message 14 of 70
09 April 2012 at 4:32pm | IP Logged 
fabriciocarraro wrote:

About "и" and "ee", how else would you put for a regular language learner? 99% of those
who learn Russian are not linguists and are not familiar with fonetic terms. I don't know
and don't want to know anything about technical terms like palatalization, verlars, etc.
The closest sound in English to the Russian "и" is usually (not always) the "ee" sound.
That's how you explain this to a new learner, and here comes the point where I must agree
with you.

But it doesn't matter. You cannot leave technical terms because they are needed. Like
explaining grammar is impossible without grammar terms. The transcription must be
consistent, the textbook must teach correctly.

1 person has voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6402 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 15 of 70
09 April 2012 at 4:34pm | IP Logged 
I think anyone who's not new to languages knows that i=ai is just an English rule and you can't assume it works for other languages.
1 person has voted this message useful



fabriciocarraro
Hexaglot
Winner TAC 2012
Senior Member
Brazil
russoparabrasileirosRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 4520 days ago

989 posts - 1454 votes 
Speaks: Portuguese*, EnglishB2, Italian, Spanish, Russian, French
Studies: Dutch, German, Japanese

 
 Message 16 of 70
09 April 2012 at 4:40pm | IP Logged 
Марк wrote:
But it doesn't matter. You cannot leave technical terms because they are needed. Like explaining grammar is impossible without grammar terms. The transcription must be consistent, the textbook must teach correctly.


Well, personally I don't know and don't want to know those technical terms, just like 99% of other people, and as I said, I took the first 12 (not sure) lessons of "The New Penguin Russian Course" just as they are, not learning any technical terms and when I joined the "Level 2" Russian in my university, my pronunciation was just as good or better than the other students'. That proves they're not "needed".
I agree that knowing them might be a useful tool, and is a must for linguists, but for a regular language learner like me (and most people) it's definitely not.

Again, since the course doesn't have accurate explanations on this matter, listening to Russian through other sources must be a priority. Youtube helps A LOT with that.

Edited by fabriciocarraro on 09 April 2012 at 5:00pm



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 70 messages over 9 pages: << Prev 13 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3594 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.