Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Romance Languages Are Difficult!

 Language Learning Forum : Specific Languages Post Reply
31 messages over 4 pages: 13 4  Next >>
Darobat
Diglot
Senior Member
Joined 6977 days ago

754 posts - 770 votes 
Speaks: English*, Russian
Studies: Latin

 
 Message 9 of 31
12 July 2006 at 11:21am | IP Logged 
Although I haven't studied a romance language, I'm going to assume that its similar; i.e. once you get the hang of it, it isn't so bad.

Don't you remember trying to learn the endings for all 6 cases, in both singular and plural, and all three genders? What about trying to remember two seperate words for every verb (perf/impf)? What about trying to remember the case that each preposition (or verb in some cases) requires?

I bet that if you keep at it, the Romance languages won't seem so bad.
1 person has voted this message useful



TDC
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6710 days ago

261 posts - 291 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin, French
Studies: Esperanto, Ukrainian, German, Italian, Spanish, Russian, Persian

 
 Message 10 of 31
12 July 2006 at 1:47pm | IP Logged 
I don't know, I'd say Romance isn't too hard, Russian is kinda difficult. But the easiest thing I can imagine is Chinese. No grammar, no endings, one word, one idea, one character. No problem! Talk about easy. When you want to say: I'm going to the store tomorrow in Chinese you say literally "I tomorrow go store" or I went to the store yesterday => "I yesterday go store" So, I'd say Romance, Germanic, and Slavic are all harder than Chinese.
1 person has voted this message useful



lady_skywalker
Triglot
Senior Member
Netherlands
aspiringpolyglotblog
Joined 6679 days ago

909 posts - 942 votes 
Speaks: Spanish, English*, Mandarin
Studies: Japanese, French, Dutch, Italian

 
 Message 11 of 31
12 July 2006 at 11:13pm | IP Logged 
TDC wrote:
I don't know, I'd say Romance isn't too hard, Russian is kinda difficult. But the easiest thing I can imagine is Chinese. No grammar, no endings, one word, one idea, one character. No problem! Talk about easy. When you want to say: I'm going to the store tomorrow in Chinese you say literally "I tomorrow go store" or I went to the store yesterday => "I yesterday go store" So, I'd say Romance, Germanic, and Slavic are all harder than Chinese.


I'm going to have to respectfully disagree. As someone who's spend years studying Mandarin, I personally find it a million times harder than any of the Romance and Germanic languages (I have no experience with the Slavic ones so I can't say). Sure, the grammar is easy but a language is far more than just grammar.

The writing system is a headache in itself and there have been countless discussions here about it. Even if you knew the meaning of each individual character (which would takes years to accomplish), you won't always necessarily understand the meaning of a sentence. It is also much harder to sound off a character you don't know. With any alphabet-based language, you can at least pronounce the word even if you don't know its meaning. It is very hard to do the same with Chinese if you don't have pinyin or 'bopomofo' to rely on.   

I'm not saying Mandarin is impossible as many people have succeeded in learning it to a fairly high standard, but I'd be careful with labelling it as being easier than any of the Romance languages.
1 person has voted this message useful





jeff_lindqvist
Diglot
Moderator
SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6698 days ago

4250 posts - 5710 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: German, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Irish, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 12 of 31
13 July 2006 at 6:36am | IP Logged 
TDC wrote:
No grammar, no endings, one word, one idea, one character. No problem!(...)


No grammar? The lack of inflections and conjugations does not make a sentence like "Earlier my wife worked at a company in Beijing" (example from Pimsleur 2) any easier. I'd say that the syntax shows quite a high level of complexity, but that's perhaps just me.
1 person has voted this message useful



Mga
Groupie
United States
beastie.redirectme.n
Joined 6912 days ago

67 posts - 66 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Arabic (Written)

 
 Message 13 of 31
13 July 2006 at 4:44pm | IP Logged 
TDC wrote:
No grammar, no endings, one word, one idea, one character. No problem! Talk about easy. When you want to say: I'm going to the store tomorrow in Chinese you say literally "I tomorrow go store" or I went to the store yesterday => "I yesterday go store" So, I'd say Romance, Germanic, and Slavic are all harder than Chinese.
Grammar is more than inflection. Why is this so hard to understand?
1 person has voted this message useful



kronos77
Groupie
United States
Joined 6528 days ago

78 posts - 81 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: Russian, Dutch, Mandarin

 
 Message 14 of 31
13 July 2006 at 5:52pm | IP Logged 
Speakers of analytic languages tend to forget that syntax is part of grammar
too. We focus on morphology since that is what is most challenging to us
intially. It's a matter of familiarity.
1 person has voted this message useful



Journeyer
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
tristan85.blogspot.c
Joined 6657 days ago

946 posts - 1110 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, German
Studies: Sign Language

 
 Message 15 of 31
13 July 2006 at 10:25pm | IP Logged 
lady_skywalker wrote:
This must be the first time I have ever heard someone say that Romance languages were hard. :)


I second the notion, at least with Spanish. I sort of have a bias towards French because I have an aunt who speaks it and so had more of an immediate interest in the language. For some reason, Spanish has always struck me as a challenging language. Not the most, certainly, but not the breeze that it seems to be known for. It might be a personal thing though to me...because other people seem to find it easier. I will not discourage anyone from wanting to learn it (quite the contrary!) but I would still warn them that it is a fairly complex language, probably a bit more than a potential student may have been expecting.

That said, I'm still glad I learned it! Now I just need to brush the rust away because frankly I cannot speak very much anymore after a couple of years of hardly speaking it. At least I've maintained for myself a lot of the written language via MSN.
1 person has voted this message useful



kronos77
Groupie
United States
Joined 6528 days ago

78 posts - 81 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: Russian, Dutch, Mandarin

 
 Message 16 of 31
13 July 2006 at 11:09pm | IP Logged 
As I think about this more, I start to realise one reason romance
languages have a reputation of being easy. They are easy to dumb down.
That is, the complex elements can be separated out and set aside for
later. This is what happens at most American universities, where
students are required to take two semesters of a language, with Spanish,
French and Italian being very popular choices. They are never really
presented with the more difficult aspects of the grammar.

Languages like Russian, on the other hand, have their complexity woven
throughout the grammar.   It is tough to separate the difficult from the
easy and students have to immediately fight their way through difficult
terrain. You can't dumb down Russian for the unmotivated college kid
looking for an easy two semester requirement.

So, the popular wisdom on campus is to take Spanish because it is easy.
And it is...for two semesters.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 31 messages over 4 pages: << Prev 13 4  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3867 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.