Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Article: Students fall short on Vocabulary

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
319 messages over 40 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 18 ... 39 40 Next >>
dampingwire
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4453 days ago

1185 posts - 1513 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian*, French
Studies: Japanese

 
 Message 137 of 319
15 April 2014 at 1:00am | IP Logged 
s_allard wrote:
I would think that anybody who dares go up for a C2 examination has
done a lot of reading about current events
and some ideas about these topics, The words themselves are not that fancy and
specialized. This is where I
come back to my hobby horse about really mastering some simple material. Do you have be
a meteorologist in
order to talk about climate change? The examiner himself may not know that much about
climate change. But
that's not really what the exam is about.


A quick look at today's BBC website throws up: Ukraine, a court case about newspapers
breaking into people's voicemails, the NSA, Heartbleed, the Pistorious trial, a blast
in Nigeria, a marathon runner who died, Commonwealth games medals, a building collapse,
an unbelievable fare dodger, yet another celebrity sex case, a school probe, Banksy
artwork, a few football related stories, an eclipse, an IRA-related story and the death
of an author. I assume that any one of those might come up as a starting point. I agree
that the maybe 80% of the unique words will be generic ("I'd suggest that", "In my
considered opinion", "I'm afraid I have to disagree with that point of view") but
sooner or later you have to be able to talk about some specifics (and be able to work
around the ones that you don't recall or aren't sure how to use).

3 persons have voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6385 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 138 of 319
15 April 2014 at 1:44am | IP Logged 
s_allard wrote:

This is the argument that always comes up. You have to have a huge receptive and productive vocabulary because you never know what will show up on the exam.

No, because you never know what will show up in the real world.
2 persons have voted this message useful



s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5218 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 139 of 319
15 April 2014 at 4:26am | IP Logged 
dampingwire wrote:
s_allard wrote:
I would think that anybody who dares go up for a C2 examination has
done a lot of reading about current events
and some ideas about these topics, The words themselves are not that fancy and
specialized. This is where I
come back to my hobby horse about really mastering some simple material. Do you have be
a meteorologist in
order to talk about climate change? The examiner himself may not know that much about
climate change. But
that's not really what the exam is about.


A quick look at today's BBC website throws up: Ukraine, a court case about newspapers
breaking into people's voicemails, the NSA, Heartbleed, the Pistorious trial, a blast
in Nigeria, a marathon runner who died, Commonwealth games medals, a building collapse,
an unbelievable fare dodger, yet another celebrity sex case, a school probe, Banksy
artwork, a few football related stories, an eclipse, an IRA-related story and the death
of an author. I assume that any one of those might come up as a starting point. I agree
that the maybe 80% of the unique words will be generic ("I'd suggest that", "In my
considered opinion", "I'm afraid I have to disagree with that point of view") but
sooner or later you have to be able to talk about some specifics (and be able to work
around the ones that you don't recall or aren't sure how to use).

This is an excellent post because it illustrate perfectly the myth of these unpredictable subjects that require such
a wide range of vocabulary. Let's put ourselves in the shoes of the IELTS or CEFR exam designers. These exams
are for the entire world and a wide range of ages and level of education. Are we really going to use as starting
points the Russian takeover of Crimea? The snooping by the NSA? The Heartbleed computer bug? You must be
kidding?

Or my favourite: the Banksy artwork. How do you design a test question using this as a starting point? Do you
really want to make an IELTS question based on this? I consider myself relatively cultivated, but I really have know
idea who Banksy is. I would probably fail because I have no specific vocabulary related to Banksy.

As I have tried many times to point out, these tests are not based on highly specific and often ephemeral topics.
These tests are not tests of knowledge of current events. The French CEFR test will not be asking about the
results of the recent municipal elections in France. Do you know the name of the new mayor of Paris? You will not
be asked what do you think of the implementation of Obamacare. You will be asked some generic question on
the role of the state in medical care.

Of course, the number of possible topics is unlimited. How do you prepare for these tests? Do you try to
memorize all the details in the Guardian newspaper or the BBC news for a year? This is ridiculous. The questions
will be phrased in generic terms. And you can answer in generic terms. Now it's up to you to demonstrate the
range of your vocabulary if you so desire by bringing up events in Crimea and maybe the Pistorious trial in
South Africa. Maybe if you can bring up the name of his dead girlfriend's name a year from now, you'll get extra
points.

If your studying for the exam consists of filling your head with all this minutiae, you are setting yourself up for
failure.

Edited by s_allard on 15 April 2014 at 4:28am

1 person has voted this message useful



s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5218 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 140 of 319
15 April 2014 at 4:52am | IP Logged 
While boning up on my English vocabulary I came across the following passage in the April 15 edition of the
Guardian:


"He probably bragged about it in the pub and somebody will shop him and then unless he owns his own hedge
fund he's probably out of a job."

I had never heard this usage of the verb "to shop" meaning "to inform on someone". You learn something every
day. And on the same page of the Guardian there was for people to write about major milestones in their lives
such as losing a stone. For a minute I thought they were talking about kidney stones. But then I realized that in
Britain a stone is still commonly used for human weights.

Now all you have to do is use these words in your IELTS exam. This should blow away the examiner.
1 person has voted this message useful



patrickwilken
Senior Member
Germany
radiant-flux.net
Joined 4321 days ago

1546 posts - 3200 votes 
Studies: German

 
 Message 141 of 319
15 April 2014 at 8:45am | IP Logged 
I have no idea how you fake a C2 exam. I have also no idea how you could possibly do the exam with a limited vocabulary and only good grammar. Here is the description for the German C2 examination:

Written Exam Taken in Groups (195 minutes)

In the reading module, you demonstrate your ability to effortlessly understand a broad spectrum of texts, irrespective of their contextual or linguistic complexity, and in doing so, comprehend the implicit meaning;
In the listening module, you show you are able to understand a wide variety of spoken language, regardless of the speed at which it is spoken, in direct dialogue as one finds in the media;
In the writing module, using a general or text-specific topic, you document your ability to compose cohesive texts, which illustrate the facts of a case in a structured, clear, fluent and stylistic manner to the respective audience and are in keeping with the intended purpose.

Individual Oral Exam (ca. 15 minutes)

In the speaking module, you make it clear you are able to freely and extensively speak as well as effortlessly take part in a discussion and, at the same time, use idiomatic expressions and differentiate finer linguistic nuances. You are given 15 minutes to prepare and structure your presentation on the topic you choose.


Sure, grammar is important. Did anyone say otherwise? But I find it ridiculous to think you could go into one of these exams vocab-lite, especially since size of vocabulary has been shown to to account for about 70% of the variance in written comprehension tests and about 50% in spoken tests.

Edited by patrickwilken on 15 April 2014 at 9:29am

1 person has voted this message useful



dampingwire
Bilingual Triglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 4453 days ago

1185 posts - 1513 votes 
Speaks: English*, Italian*, French
Studies: Japanese

 
 Message 142 of 319
15 April 2014 at 10:27am | IP Logged 
s_allard wrote:
dampingwire wrote:

A quick look at today's BBC website throws up: Ukraine, a court case about newspapers
breaking into people's voicemails, the NSA, Heartbleed, the Pistorious trial, a blast
in Nigeria, a marathon runner who died, Commonwealth games medals, a building collapse,
an unbelievable fare dodger, yet another celebrity sex case, a school probe, Banksy
artwork, a few football related stories, an eclipse, an IRA-related story and the death
of an author. I assume that any one of those might come up as a starting point. I agree
that the maybe 80% of the unique words will be generic ("I'd suggest that", "In my
considered opinion", "I'm afraid I have to disagree with that point of view") but
sooner or later you have to be able to talk about some specifics (and be able to work
around the ones that you don't recall or aren't sure how to use).

This is an excellent post because it illustrate perfectly the myth of these unpredictable subjects
that require such
a wide range of vocabulary. Let's put ourselves in the shoes of the IELTS or CEFR exam designers.
These exams
are for the entire world and a wide range of ages and level of education. Are we really going to
use as starting
points the Russian takeover of Crimea? The snooping by the NSA? The Heartbleed computer bug? You
must be
kidding?


Crimea, snooping and Heartbleed are all worldwide events. I've seen all three on French and Italian
news sites. I've seen the first two on NHK News (Japanese). I've no idea what an examiner might use
as a starting point - are there any sample transcripts available? They are all topics that have
cropped up in the kitchen at work. The Indian and Japanese guys seemed to cope. MH370 came up too.

s_allard wrote:
Or my favourite: the Banksy artwork. How do you design a test question using this
as a starting point? Do you
really want to make an IELTS question based on this? I consider myself relatively cultivated, but I
really have know
idea who Banksy is. I would probably fail because I have no specific vocabulary related to Banksy.


I thought the point was that no-one knows who Banksy is :-) His latest oeuvre was mentioned on
Corriere della sera so I don't think he's a uniquely Anglo-Saxon
phenomenon.

s_allard wrote:
As I have tried many times to point out, these tests are not based on highly
specific and often ephemeral topics.
These tests are not tests of knowledge of current events. The French CEFR test will not be asking
about the
results of the recent municipal elections in France. Do you know the name of the new mayor of
Paris? You will not
be asked what do you think of the implementation of Obamacare. You will be asked some generic
question on
the role of the state in medical care.


Or I might be asked about urban pollution and Paris' latest move to only allow motorists in every
other day: How does that compare to whatever might be going on locally in my area. That sounds
exactly like the sort of question that might crop up in the kitchen at work.

s_allard wrote:
Of course, the number of possible topics is unlimited. How do you prepare for these
tests? Do you try to
memorize all the details in the Guardian newspaper or the BBC news for a year? This is ridiculous.
The questions
will be phrased in generic terms. And you can answer in generic terms. Now it's up to you to
demonstrate the
range of your vocabulary if you so desire by bringing up events in Crimea and maybe the Pistorious
trial in
South Africa. Maybe if you can bring up the name of his dead girlfriend's name a year from now,
you'll get extra
points.


I don't think I suggested that you need to memorise all of this. You might, however, try reading
the Guardian or the BBC website for a month or so just to make sure that there's nothing that crops
up that stumps you. You don't need to remember that Boris is the mayor or that there is a bike
scheme that bears his name but "mayor" and "bike" are useful vocabulary that shouldn't leave you
confused.

s_allard wrote:
If your studying for the exam consists of filling your head with all this minutiae,
you are setting yourself up for
failure.


Absolutely. You don't need to remember the name of the girl the Blade Runner shot, but "shoot",
"gun", "bathroom door" might be useful things to know in general.


Edited by dampingwire on 15 April 2014 at 10:30am

2 persons have voted this message useful



luke
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6993 days ago

3133 posts - 4351 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish
Studies: Esperanto, French

 
 Message 143 of 319
15 April 2014 at 10:44am | IP Logged 
Someone here posted some videos a while back that show things examiners should look for, such as a person how changes the subject so they can go into a rehearsed monologue.
1 person has voted this message useful



Serpent
Octoglot
Senior Member
Russian Federation
serpent-849.livejour
Joined 6385 days ago

9753 posts - 15779 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese
Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish

 
 Message 144 of 319
15 April 2014 at 11:40am | IP Logged 
patrickwilken wrote:
I have no idea how you fake a C2 exam.
Did you see the link on the previous page? Some great old posts by Cavesa and mrwarper.


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 319 messages over 40 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 1.3584 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.