Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

John McWhorter - The Language Hoax

  Tags: Linguistics | Book
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion (Topic Closed Topic Closed) Post Reply
69 messages over 9 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 1 ... 8 9 Next >>
Doitsujin
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 5115 days ago

1256 posts - 2363 votes 
Speaks: German*, English

 
 Message 1 of 69
10 June 2014 at 4:58pm | IP Logged 
To promote his latest book, linguist John McWhorter gave the hosts of the Talk the Talk podcast a long interview about his new book "The Language Hoax: Why the World Looks the Same in Any Language" (and Whorfianism in general).
3 persons have voted this message useful



Stolan
Senior Member
United States
Joined 3827 days ago

274 posts - 368 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Thai, Lowland Scots
Studies: Arabic (classical), Cantonese

 
 Message 2 of 69
10 June 2014 at 5:14pm | IP Logged 
He's right half the time on languages, the other half of his ideas are untrue.
He is right about this, we all hear the usual "language x=xyz" but it doesn't affect a persons brain, really.
Thanks for the link.
1 person has voted this message useful



iguanamon
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Virgin Islands
Speaks: Ladino
Joined 5057 days ago

2237 posts - 6731 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Portuguese, Haitian Creole, Creole (French)

 
 Message 3 of 69
10 June 2014 at 5:35pm | IP Logged 
Stolan, I'm curious. Do you have a degree in linguistics? Barring that, did you study linguistics at university? Or, is your linguistics knowledge derived from self-study? Your posts are written from a position of authority.
11 persons have voted this message useful



Stolan
Senior Member
United States
Joined 3827 days ago

274 posts - 368 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Thai, Lowland Scots
Studies: Arabic (classical), Cantonese

 
 Message 4 of 69
10 June 2014 at 5:55pm | IP Logged 
I don't have a degree, and I don't claim to be an expert on every single term or construction in languages, but I
believe I have far fewer misconceptions than 95% of people who attempt to understand language. And if I do have
misconceptions, then they have to be the kind where I deduce something from a set of given facts with some error
rather than "lol, it is common knowledge" or hearsay.

I would be more tolerable if linguistics weren't in such a horrific state. The fact the Sapir Whorf hypothesis is allowed
to exist is the equivalent to attempting to cure cancer with self flagellation. I don't confuse the virus with a parasite,
I know that antibiotics are not the same as antivirals etc.

Edited by Stolan on 10 June 2014 at 6:04pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Elexi
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5360 days ago

938 posts - 1839 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: French, German, Latin

 
 Message 5 of 69
10 June 2014 at 6:04pm | IP Logged 
I thought the Sapir Whorf hypothesis had gone years ago! - I remember it being popular
among anthropology students in the early 1990s as a proof for cultural relativism, but I
also remember going to a lecture series on it where professors from the anthropology,
linguistics and psychology departments utterly demolished it.   
8 persons have voted this message useful



Doitsujin
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 5115 days ago

1256 posts - 2363 votes 
Speaks: German*, English

 
 Message 6 of 69
10 June 2014 at 6:13pm | IP Logged 
Stolan wrote:
He's right half the time on languages, the other half of his ideas are untrue.

Could you please back up this blanket statement with some specific examples of ideas that you don't agree with and why you don't agree with them?

8 persons have voted this message useful



hrhenry
Octoglot
Senior Member
United States
languagehopper.blogs
Joined 4925 days ago

1871 posts - 3642 votes 
Speaks: English*, SpanishC2, ItalianC2, Norwegian, Catalan, Galician, Turkish, Portuguese
Studies: Polish, Indonesian, Ojibwe

 
 Message 7 of 69
10 June 2014 at 7:54pm | IP Logged 
Stolan wrote:
...
but I believe I have far fewer misconceptions than 95% of people who attempt to
understand language.

Does this 95% only include other self-learners such as yourself, or does it also include
scholars and academics?

Either way, it's sure to insult a good portion of both camps.

R.
==
8 persons have voted this message useful



Luso
Hexaglot
Senior Member
Portugal
Joined 5856 days ago

819 posts - 1812 votes 
Speaks: Portuguese*, French, EnglishC2, GermanB1, Italian, Spanish
Studies: Sanskrit, Arabic (classical)

 
 Message 8 of 69
10 June 2014 at 8:24pm | IP Logged 
@ Stolan:

In this thread, your over-reaching affirmations managed to alienate both tarvos and Chung.

In this one, you already elicited some eyebrow-raising from a few other members.

Please try to remember that some people are not knowledgeable and might actually believe you when you write things like "Vietnamese (and the rest) are pretty much tonal versions of Indonesian."


8 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 69 messages over 9 pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.8281 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.