116 messages over 15 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 14 15
luke Diglot Senior Member United States Joined 7203 days ago 3133 posts - 4351 votes Speaks: English*, Spanish Studies: Esperanto, French
| Message 113 of 116 13 December 2014 at 12:35am | IP Logged |
Who came up with that syntax anyway?
Jeffers wrote:
In my limited experience, people who start a sentence with "I literally... " usually have
something stupid or inane to say, |
|
|
Like when someone says, "I literally s**t my pants", and you start sniffing to find out if they're stupid
or not?
Edited by luke on 13 December 2014 at 12:49am
2 persons have voted this message useful
| Serpent Octoglot Senior Member Russian Federation serpent-849.livejour Joined 6595 days ago 9753 posts - 15779 votes 4 sounds Speaks: Russian*, English, FinnishC1, Latin, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese Studies: Danish, Romanian, Polish, Belarusian, Ukrainian, Croatian, Slovenian, Catalan, Czech, Galician, Dutch, Swedish
| Message 114 of 116 13 December 2014 at 4:39am | IP Logged |
Ari wrote:
It's like saying "You shouldn't say 'pardon my French' unless you're actually speaking French. |
|
|
I wonder what the French say
2 persons have voted this message useful
| Jeffers Senior Member United Kingdom Joined 4907 days ago 2151 posts - 3960 votes Speaks: English* Studies: Hindi, Ancient Greek, French, Sanskrit, German
| Message 115 of 116 13 December 2014 at 9:43am | IP Logged |
luke wrote:
Who came up with that syntax anyway? |
|
|
Your Google-fu is weak today, my friend.
Here's a discussion about "I kid you not", in which one person suggests it evolved into "I s**t you not". That makes sense to me.
Edited by Jeffers on 13 December 2014 at 9:43am
1 person has voted this message useful
| tarvos Super Polyglot Winner TAC 2012 Senior Member China likeapolyglot.wordpr Joined 4705 days ago 5310 posts - 9399 votes Speaks: Dutch*, English, Swedish, French, Russian, German, Italian, Norwegian, Mandarin, Romanian, Afrikaans Studies: Greek, Modern Hebrew, Spanish, Portuguese, Czech, Korean, Esperanto, Finnish
| Message 116 of 116 21 December 2014 at 12:38pm | IP Logged |
ScottScheule wrote:
Yes, I've heard some language "authorities" (scare quotes
because these are simply people with popular blogs, not credentials) criticize some
learners for reasons that, at the end of the day, were not necessarily deficiencies in
their learning styles, but rather just a result of people seeking different goals.
Some want to read famous works, some want to talk at a "sophisticated" level, some
want to be able to make small talk with locals, some are just fascinated by different
grammars and sounds and don't mind just tasting languages. It complicates things
terribly, but nevertheless, these are all perfectly legitimate aims. |
|
|
There's also the problem that before you sound sophisticated, you're going to sound
unsophisticated... this stage of "I feel like a clown" is something everyone learning
languages that is going through the upper levels where speaking well is important will
recognize.
As for aural media, I do consume it, but I don't find anything interesting in
listening to something I can't understand, whereas with reading I can look it up.
That's why I start with speaking to human beings, because here I can listen in context
and figure out how natives truly speak.
Holy moly two-sentence run-on mix-up extravaganza!
Edited by tarvos on 21 December 2014 at 2:06pm
2 persons have voted this message useful
|
If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register
You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum
This page was generated in 0.1875 seconds.
DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
|