Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

EU & Languages: Policies and your view?

  Tags: Europe | Multilingual
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
66 messages over 9 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 8 9 Next >>
doviende
Diglot
Senior Member
Canada
languagefixatio
Joined 5783 days ago

533 posts - 1245 votes 
Speaks: English*, German
Studies: Spanish, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Hindi, Swedish, Portuguese

 
 Message 57 of 66
21 July 2010 at 10:30am | IP Logged 
The speakers of the language and their social/cultural artifacts (art, TV, newspapers, magazines) reflect the current state of the culture and the dominant ideas. For instance, in the main English-speaking countries, there's a high emphasis on self-reliance / personal independence, especially in relation to entrepreneurism and business. There's also a strong near-religious belief in the superiority of capitalist markets over any other form of economy. These are basic cultural assumptions that are required in order to properly understand the meaning of much that is written.

As you learn the language and investigate sources of the language to read and listen to, these assumptions will be everywhere, and you will have to absorb them too, if you wish to understand the things that people are saying. It's not a part of the morphology / syntax / phonetics of the language, but how the language is used everywhere.

In Esperanto, the culture is about equality, cooperation, and peace. These are reflected in Esperanto cultural activities and writings, as a required assumption in order to fully understand how they work.
3 persons have voted this message useful



johntm93
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5124 days ago

587 posts - 746 votes 
2 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Spanish

 
 Message 58 of 66
21 July 2010 at 11:10am | IP Logged 
doviende wrote:
The speakers of the language and their social/cultural artifacts (art, TV, newspapers, magazines) reflect the current state of the culture and the dominant ideas. For instance, in the main English-speaking countries, there's a high emphasis on self-reliance / personal independence, especially in relation to entrepreneurism and business. There's also a strong near-religious belief in the superiority of capitalist markets over any other form of economy. These are basic cultural assumptions that are required in order to properly understand the meaning of much that is written.

I still don't think that it's an "ideology" of the language. It may be the ideology of a lot of native speakers, but it has to do more with the country/culture of the people as opposed to the language. I can accept that conlangs can be created with an ideology, but natlangs? No.


Edited by johntm93 on 21 July 2010 at 8:28pm

3 persons have voted this message useful



Andy E
Triglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6900 days ago

1651 posts - 1939 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, French

 
 Message 59 of 66
21 July 2010 at 2:49pm | IP Logged 
doviende wrote:
There's also a strong near-religious belief in the superiority of capitalist markets over any other form of economy. These are basic cultural assumptions that are required in order to properly understand the meaning of much that is written.


That's a pretty broad brush you're painting with there. There's also a somwhat insulting assumption that anyone needs to buy in to a point of view "to properly understand it". So, if I don't agree with what I'm reading, it's because I didn't fully grasp the underlying meaning?


3 persons have voted this message useful



GREGORG4000
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5320 days ago

307 posts - 479 votes 
Speaks: English*, Finnish
Studies: Japanese, Korean, Amharic, French

 
 Message 60 of 66
21 July 2010 at 6:06pm | IP Logged 
If English is spoken by somebody with super-equality-cooperation-peace opinions, then what part of the language has the super-capitalistic undertone? Is there some sort of cash clinking that can always be heard from the teeth of English speakers, and is there always a deep peaceful chant that emanates from an Esperantist's throat, regardless of the actual words?
3 persons have voted this message useful



mrhenrik
Triglot
Moderator
Norway
Joined 5876 days ago

482 posts - 658 votes 
Speaks: Norwegian*, English, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 61 of 66
22 July 2010 at 12:39am | IP Logged 
If you'd say English has deaths on it's conscience, wouldn't Esperanto also have that as
soon as it became the official EU language? Or is it somehow excluded from that?

How does a language have deaths on it's conscience?
3 persons have voted this message useful



aarontp
Groupie
United States
Joined 5064 days ago

94 posts - 139 votes 

 
 Message 62 of 66
22 July 2010 at 1:34am | IP Logged 
All widely spoken languages were spread by violence at one point or another. It's not
like ordinary humans were historically as thrilled to learn new languages as we are.
They most likely learned because they or their ancestors were enslaved, conquered, or
dispossessed of their homelands. Anyway, I don't advocate that all Europeans learn
English. That's their business, just as it's my business whether to learn European
languages. But it seems to me that continuing with English, which offers the added
benefit of communication with 300 million Americans, 200 million (approx) Indians, 51
million Brits, and many millions of others all over the world; plus a gigantic literary
tradition, is a more desirable option than starting with an artificial language from
scratch.

And while it may be true that English carries with it certain biases; it is not
reciprocally true that Esperanto or any other language would be neutral or only bias
toward ideas that nearly everyone approves of (love, peace, cooperation, ect.). Once
adopted by hundreds of millions of people--it would become no less pernicious
than English; and would eventually become saddled with the same baggage as the other
dominant world languages.

Anyway, this whole notion of official languages is ridiculous to begin with. People
will learn the languages that are relevant to them, and right now the most important
business language in the world is English; hence people want to learn English. In
another hundred years, perhaps it will be German, or Chinese (likely in a modified
form) or even Spanish.

Edited by aarontp on 22 July 2010 at 1:44am

3 persons have voted this message useful



guesto
Groupie
Australia
Joined 5538 days ago

76 posts - 118 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Italian, Spanish

 
 Message 63 of 66
22 July 2010 at 5:08am | IP Logged 
doviende wrote:




In Esperanto, the culture is about equality, cooperation, and peace.



Yes, but it's about all of that from a left-wing, progressive, socialist, PC, internationalist point of view. Hence, it's not politically neutral. Hence, no one who doesn't share that ideology will learn it. Hence, it will never become international. And with a real language you can at least argue that "well, it just happened that way", but Esperanto was created in light of this ideology to the extend that its hard to tell which is the consequence of which.
1 person has voted this message useful



johntm93
Senior Member
United States
Joined 5124 days ago

587 posts - 746 votes 
2 sounds
Speaks: English*
Studies: German, Spanish

 
 Message 64 of 66
22 July 2010 at 5:23am | IP Logged 
mrhenrik wrote:
If you'd say English has deaths on it's conscience, wouldn't Esperanto also have that as
soon as it became the official EU language? Or is it somehow excluded from that?

How does a language have deaths on it's conscience?
I agree.
If English has deaths on it's conscience, then doesn't Arabic, German, Russian, Spanish, and every other natural language?



guesto wrote:
doviende wrote:




In Esperanto, the culture is about equality, cooperation, and peace.



Yes, but it's about all of that from a left-wing, progressive, socialist, PC, internationalist point of view. Hence, it's not politically neutral. Hence, no one who doesn't share that ideology will learn it. Hence, it will never become international. And with a real language you can at least argue that "well, it just happened that way", but Esperanto was created in light of this ideology to the extend that its hard to tell which is the consequence of which.
I wouldn't go that far, but it was made by a guy who grew up in a place in Poland (I believe) where 5 or 6 areas were spoken in his city, and somehow that made him want to make a "neutral" (even though it's not) language so everyone could communicate. So it was made for diverse people to communicate (so you could extend that to "peace").

I just realized your post could have been a joke on the "English is capitalist durrr post" someone else made, but I'll leave the rest of this up anyway :\


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 66 messages over 9 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 79  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4531 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.