Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Heinrich Schliemann’s memorizing method

 Language Learning Forum : Polyglots Post Reply
63 messages over 8 pages: 1 2 35 6 7 8 Next >>
Sydney
Groupie
Yugoslavia
Joined 6454 days ago

58 posts - 71 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Serbian

 
 Message 25 of 63
29 February 2008 at 8:33pm | IP Logged 
I once substitute-taught an ESL class for kids around 7-8 years old. The kids had CDs that accompanied their textbooks and I was playing the CD during a listening activity, it was a dialogue that should have been something new for the kids to listen to and attempt to understand in class, but this one kid was enthusiastically speaking along word-for-word (and intonation-wise) to the whole thing! The CD had songs on it and I guess it was his favorite thing to listen to at home, dialogues included. I thought it was pretty impressive (and the kid was adorable). He came upon this kind of thing quite naturally!



Edited by Sydney on 29 February 2008 at 8:35pm

1 person has voted this message useful



ryuukohito
Bilingual Diglot
Groupie
Malaysia
Joined 6238 days ago

89 posts - 98 votes 
Speaks: EnglishC2*, Malay*
Studies: French, Japanese

 
 Message 26 of 63
01 March 2008 at 1:25am | IP Logged 
If I may offer a little opinion of my own: I too am attempting the Heinrich-Schliemann method, for my Japanese and French studies.

As far as I can tell, it's been of great help for my Japanese. In the Japanese language, the verb comes last, so I've always had to consciously remember and make sure that the order of my sentences follows that rule; but now, I don't even have to think about it. What I speak or write just 'comes out' that way.

What I have discovered, and like best, about Heinrich Schliemann's method, is that it has helped me internalize the usage of some particles; now I don't even have to think about which particle is suited for where, because the cache of sentences in my head seems to be able to 'tell' me which is the most appropriate one for the situation. (E.g. the で versus に problem.) And I can always and just as easily contrast and compare against the original sentences to know whether what I'm saying is grammatically right or wrong.

Also, I have become not as hesitant when speaking. Sentences just seem to roll off my tongue; whereas before I had to construct a sentence off the bat, now it seems that my mind gets a sentence structure, automatically substitutes the words that gets across my meaning. So I am able to produce a sentence very quickly.

But I do have to admit that it's tiresome, having to memorize entire stories and chunks of text. (I try my best to memorize a text as it is, and in its original order; but sometimes, I make sure I memorize the exact sentence, and can reproduce it perfectly per se, but not in the original order and structure.)
3 persons have voted this message useful



slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6677 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 28 of 63
01 March 2008 at 4:44am | IP Logged 
Why don't you use the DVD movie method?
I am learning by rote the scripts. It's easy and efortless.
And much esier if you use the SRS sentence method.


1 person has voted this message useful



Raincrowlee
Tetraglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6704 days ago

621 posts - 808 votes 
Speaks: English*, Mandarin, Korean, French
Studies: Indonesian, Japanese

 
 Message 29 of 63
01 March 2008 at 6:11am | IP Logged 
bacchanalian wrote:
I have pi memorized to 1,000,000 decimal places.

Just teasing.

However, I memorized the "to be or not to be" soliloquy in Hamlet (three pages of small print) in a matter of
hours...without using any memory tricks. This text was in something sort of resembling English but not really! I
don't know about an entire book however...or in a foreign language...but the mind is capable of more than we
realize...ask Kim Peek...



I know a couple of people who have memorized Shakespeare plays just to do it. I believe one of them memorized Hamlet; I forget what the other memorized. But I also think about all the people who have had reams of poems memorized, or the scholars who would memorize the Bible or Chinese Classics. It can be done.
1 person has voted this message useful



Alkeides
Senior Member
Bhutan
Joined 6150 days ago

636 posts - 644 votes 

 
 Message 30 of 63
01 March 2008 at 11:29am | IP Logged 
I seemed to remember the full extract regarding Schliemann's method as containing something regarding comparing "Paul et Virginie" in French and Modern Greek to learn the vocabulary; thus I googled for more details.

http://www.seg.co.jp/cgi-bin/kb7.cgi?b=sss-old&c=e&id=86 contains the full text, and a Japanese analysis of it for those of you studying Japanese. It also contains, AFAIK, some parts that other sites posting the extract have chosen to omit. (Hiring the poor Jew who didn't know any Russian lol and the tenants complaining)
1 person has voted this message useful





Hencke
Tetraglot
Moderator
Spain
Joined 6896 days ago

2340 posts - 2444 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, Finnish, EnglishC2, Spanish
Studies: Mandarin
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 31 of 63
01 March 2008 at 5:27pm | IP Logged 
raeve wrote:
Interesting method. I once tried to memorize "The Raven" by Edgar Allan Poe, but I gave up after 4 verses. I guess my brain is no use for that.

Ha, funny you should say that. I actually did memorise "The Raven" many years ago, but all that is left now are little random scraps: "Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pondered weak and weary, etc..."
1 person has voted this message useful



Ichiro
Triglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 6211 days ago

111 posts - 152 votes 
Speaks: English*, Japanese, French
Studies: Spanish, Mandarin, Korean, Malay

 
 Message 32 of 63
02 March 2008 at 10:45am | IP Logged 
ryuukohito wrote:
But I do have to admit that it's tiresome, having to memorize entire stories and chunks of text. (I try my best to memorize a text as it is, and in its original order; but sometimes, I make sure I memorize the exact sentence, and can reproduce it perfectly per se, but not in the original order and structure.)


Could I ask, how do you keep the stuff you memorised live in your head? Doesn't it just vanish again?

Or does that not matter - do you feel that if the words and structure have been embedded by learning some passage, you don't need to reproduce the whole thing again at some much later date?


1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 63 messages over 8 pages: << Prev 1 2 35 6 7 8  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3281 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.