Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Quantity makes the difference

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
122 messages over 16 pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 1 ... 15 16 Next >>
slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6485 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 1 of 122
18 December 2010 at 3:06pm | IP Logged 
I have been here for a long time and reading a lot of discussions and arguments about how to learn languages. It has been very useful for me because it has been a boost to my motivation and I have learned several interesting techniques. However, my conclusion is the same I got two or three years ago: as long as your method has input and output, TIME spent with the language (quantity) is the most important factor.

Several of us want to get native or near native fluency in our target language or languages. We read and write a lot about different methods and best methods, but why native speakers are so superior when it comes to understand and speak their own language? What's their secret? Why are we so good in our native language?

I think it is pretty obvious. It all comes down to the QUANTITY of our native language we have been exposed to during our life.

If we interact with our native language around 16 hours every day (input plus output), it means we can accumulate 5,840 hours when we are one years old, 17,520 hours when we are three years old, 29,200 when we are five years old, 58,400 when we are ten years old and 116,800 when we are twenty years old.

Do you really want to speak like a twenty years old native speaker with only a little fraction of this huge amount of exposure?

We can talk endlessly about best or bad methods, but in the long run, the QUANTITY or AMOUNT of target language you are exposed to will determine your overall progress and success.

If we think about this and the fact that the main problem with language learning is the average language learner gives up,I have two conclusions:

1-As long as you have INPUT and OUTPUT the most important factor is TIME= QUANTITY of exposure.

2-The best method is the method you don't give up. KEEP doing.




Edited by slucido on 18 December 2010 at 3:06pm

25 persons have voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 5821 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 2 of 122
18 December 2010 at 7:06pm | IP Logged 
slucido wrote:
I have been here for a long time and reading a lot of discussions and arguments about how to learn languages. It has been very useful for me because it has been a boost to my motivation and I have learned several interesting techniques. However, my conclusion is the same I got two or three years ago: as long as your method has input and output, TIME spent with the language (quantity) is the most important factor.

And I'm still of the same opinion I was every other time you've said this:

There is no "most important factor".

There are many factors in language learning. Neglect any of them and you will be less successful.
13 persons have voted this message useful



slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6485 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 3 of 122
19 December 2010 at 12:35pm | IP Logged 
Cainntear wrote:

There is no "most important factor".



I am very sorry, but...

REPETITION is the most important factor.

All boils down to this.

Please, keep it simple and sweet.






4 persons have voted this message useful



WANNABEAFREAK
Diglot
Senior Member
Hong Kong
cantonese.hk
Joined 6637 days ago

144 posts - 185 votes 
1 sounds
Speaks: English*, Cantonese
Studies: French

 
 Message 4 of 122
19 December 2010 at 3:25pm | IP Logged 
Not really.... look at that Chinese guy from Belgium called FĂ©lix. He studied Italian for 3 months and speaks it super super fluently at advanced level. He couldn't have possibly spent 20 hours per day inputting and outputting to get to this level within 3 months if another factor of familiarity to your native language wasn't also important too.
1 person has voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 5821 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 5 of 122
19 December 2010 at 3:28pm | IP Logged 
slucido wrote:
I am very sorry, but...

REPETITION is the most important factor.

All boils down to this.

Please, keep it simple and sweet.

"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- Albert Einstein.

8 persons have voted this message useful



Oasis88
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 5515 days ago

160 posts - 187 votes 
Speaks: English*
Studies: Spanish, Italian

 
 Message 6 of 122
19 December 2010 at 3:49pm | IP Logged 
I completely agree with the OP. The Japanese all the time guy has written a lot on this
and it just seems to make sense to me and it's part of the reason that I don't believe in
"methods". Time on task is the most important thing and with enough of this we'll be wise
enough to figure out what we need to do to progress.
3 persons have voted this message useful



slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6485 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 7 of 122
19 December 2010 at 4:39pm | IP Logged 
I don't know anything about the technology behind my TV, I guess it should be very complex, but I know that I only need to press a button to watch my TV

I am sure that second language acquisition is much more complex, but I know that repetition is the button I need to press.

Maybe some people need to press less time (maybe Felix) and other people more time, but the button is need to be pressed.   

Keep it simple and sweet.



Edited by slucido on 19 December 2010 at 4:40pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 5821 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 8 of 122
19 December 2010 at 4:58pm | IP Logged 
The second S in KISS stands for "stupid".


3 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 122 messages over 16 pages: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3281 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.