What does "basic fluency" really mean? (General discussion) Language Learning Forum

What does "basic fluency" really mean?
Tags: Fluency \| Reading \| Grammar
Share with: Delicious Digg reddit Facebook StumbleUpon
Language Learning Forum : General discussion

106 messages over 14 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13 14

Captain Haddock
Diglot
Senior Member
Japan
kanjicabinet.tumblr.
Joined 6767 days ago
2282 posts - 2814 votes

Speaks: English*, Japanese
Studies: French, Korean, Ancient Greek

Message 105 of 106

06 October 2006 at 2:23am | IP Logged

Quote:

"Ees bes dat you talk clear and dey will know what you askin for".

That is in fact a creole, probably the creole spoken in Jamaica (or possibly Belize), although he might be dressing it up with more English elements. Note that creoles are separate languages, even if there is some mutual intelligibility.

Quote:

Might he speak a pigeon of English?

You mean pidgin of course. :) There aren't many of those around these days.* A pidgin becomes a creole once it has a generation of native speakers who develop a complete grammar for it.

(* "Pidgin English" notwithstanding, which is actually a creole spoken in Hawaii.)

Like Keith, I'm capable of communicating and getting along in a completely Japanese environment; that doesn't mean I'm anywhere near fluent yet. However, I'm not letting my skills fossilize either; I'm actively improving and will reach fluency one day.

Edited by Captain Haddock on 06 October 2006 at 2:25am
1 person has voted this message useful

zerothinking
Senior Member
Australia
Joined 6371 days ago
528 posts - 772 votes

Speaks: English*

Message 106 of 106

03 May 2008 at 1:50am | IP Logged

Sinfonia wrote:

Captain Haddock wrote:

As with my standard Canadian English, "have", "of", and "-'ve" are three
different vowels. I've never understood how people make that bizarre
mistake � who on earth taught them that "of" was a helping verb?.

Maybe Malcolm knows? :-)

It's just a speech thing :P people unstress the have to the point it sounds like of

I should have
I should'ave
I should'v or
I should'ev - e being a schwa

With that logic
none of that - unstress the o in normal speech and it becomes
none'ev that - ev is of and hey presto 'ev' sounds like an unstressed of

1 person has voted this message useful

This discussion contains 106 messages over 14 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

If you wish to post a reply to this topic you must first login. If you are not already registered you must first register

Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum

This page was generated in 1.3906 seconds.