Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Is the verb "to be" irregular in your...

 Language Learning Forum : Philological Room Post Reply
41 messages over 6 pages: 13 4 5 6  Next >>
Cainntear
Pentaglot
Senior Member
Scotland
linguafrankly.blogsp
Joined 6012 days ago

4399 posts - 7687 votes 
Speaks: Lowland Scots, English*, French, Spanish, Scottish Gaelic
Studies: Catalan, Italian, German, Irish, Welsh

 
 Message 10 of 41
09 March 2011 at 3:50pm | IP Logged 
ReneeMona wrote:
What about creoles?

As far as I know, all verbs in Papiamentu are regular, in fact they're not conjugated at all:

As regular/irregular refers to conjugation, if there's no conjugation, they're not regular or irregular, just as an invisible leaf isn't green....

However, in the case of Papiamentu, we can still argue that the copular verb is irregular, because other verbs take a tense particle, and the copula is the bare tense particle, so is clearly handled differently.

In fact, you could argue that the copular in Papiamentu does conjugate, in which case it is very irregular indeed, as no other verbs do....

Back to the original question (and on a related note)
Celtic languages (or at least Gaelic, Irish and Welsh)
The verb "to be" is the most irregular verb in the languages.
There is a historic equivalent distinction between ser-like and estar-like "to be".

The estar-like is the only verb to conjugate for simple present -- present constructions in Celtic languages therefore rely on the progressive aspect.

The ser-like "to be" is vanishing. In Scottish Gaelic is only takes two forms, and often disappears before this/that, and is implied in question words. In Welsh it has vanished almost entirely, never appearing explicitly in a basic sentence -- you can only see its presence by its effect on word order. In Welsh it is only explicitly used (AFAIK) in answer to yes/no questions.

Edited by Cainntear on 09 March 2011 at 3:58pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



ReneeMona
Diglot
Senior Member
Netherlands
Joined 5336 days ago

864 posts - 1274 votes 
Speaks: Dutch*, EnglishC2
Studies: French

 
 Message 11 of 41
09 March 2011 at 3:50pm | IP Logged 
Kuikentje wrote:
In Afrikaans the verb 'to be' is regular, always "is":

ek is
jy/u is
hy /sy/ dit is
ons is
julle is
hulle is


But the infinitive is "wees" and the past participle is "gewees". According to wikipedia, "to be" and "to have" are the only two irregular verbs in Afrikaans.
1 person has voted this message useful



clumsy
Octoglot
Senior Member
Poland
lang-8.com/6715Registered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 5179 days ago

1116 posts - 1367 votes 
Speaks: Polish*, English, Japanese, Korean, French, Mandarin, Italian, Vietnamese
Studies: Spanish, Arabic (Written), Swedish
Studies: Danish, Dari, Kirundi

 
 Message 12 of 41
09 March 2011 at 5:04pm | IP Logged 
It's irregual even in Vietnamese , you negate it irregulary.

In Mandarin it's rather regular.
And Cantonese.
Although it has no infinitive.

我爱是你 would be wrong.
maybe you use 当, I am not sure.


But I think it can be regular in Indonesian.


ini adalah buku.
However I am not sure.
1 person has voted this message useful



matthewmathieu
Newbie
United States
Joined 5121 days ago

14 posts - 19 votes

 
 Message 13 of 41
09 March 2011 at 5:35pm | IP Logged 
Is it really just frequency that leads to this verb nearly always being irregular in the present? Is it absolutely absurd
to suggest that there may be something irregular about "being" in itself, on a semantic level, that contributes to this
irregularity of conjugation?
2 persons have voted this message useful



Bao
Diglot
Senior Member
Germany
tinyurl.com/pe4kqe5
Joined 5767 days ago

2256 posts - 4046 votes 
Speaks: German*, English
Studies: French, Spanish, Japanese, Mandarin

 
 Message 14 of 41
09 March 2011 at 7:35pm | IP Logged 
In English and German, the current paradigms of "to be" are made up of what used to be forms of several verbs with meaning related to existence, but different lexical aspects. That might be true for all Germanic languages, I don't know.
2 persons have voted this message useful





jeff_lindqvist
Diglot
Moderator
SwedenRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 6910 days ago

4250 posts - 5711 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*, English
Studies: German, Spanish, Russian, Dutch, Mandarin, Esperanto, Irish, French
Personal Language Map

 
 Message 15 of 41
09 March 2011 at 10:56pm | IP Logged 
Some info here:
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=be
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=am
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=is
3 persons have voted this message useful



cymrotom
Tetraglot
Groupie
United States
cymrympls.blogspot.c
Joined 5038 days ago

56 posts - 60 votes 
Speaks: English*, German, Mandarin, Welsh

 
 Message 16 of 41
09 March 2011 at 11:29pm | IP Logged 
I'm unfamiliar with Spanish, could you list the ser and estar-like Welsh verbs?



Cainntear wrote:

Back to the original question (and on a related note)
Celtic languages (or at least Gaelic, Irish and Welsh)
The verb "to be" is the most irregular verb in the languages.
There is a historic equivalent distinction between ser-like and estar-like "to be".

The estar-like is the only verb to conjugate for simple present -- present constructions in Celtic languages therefore rely on the progressive aspect.

The ser-like "to be" is vanishing. In Scottish Gaelic is only takes two forms, and often disappears before this/that, and is implied in question words. In Welsh it has vanished almost entirely, never appearing explicitly in a basic sentence -- you can only see its presence by its effect on word order. In Welsh it is only explicitly used (AFAIK) in answer to yes/no questions.



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 41 messages over 6 pages: << Prev 13 4 5 6  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3910 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.