Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

English as the universal language

 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
206 messages over 26 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 13 ... 25 26 Next >>
cordelia0507
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5658 days ago

1473 posts - 2176 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 97 of 206
14 November 2009 at 12:21pm | IP Logged 
Currently the norm for language studies in school, in Northern Europe (smaller countries) is some variation of this (don't nitpick, just an illustration)

Current Setup
Foreign language 1 (compulsory):  English
Foreign language 2 (compulsory) Choose one:   German / French   
Foreign language 3 (optional) Choose one: As above + Spanish / Russian (in some schools a non-European language on offer).



In the interest of fairness, simplicity and promoting unity on equal terms:


My Preferred model for the EU!
Foreign Language 1 (compulsory): Esperanto
Foreign Language 2 (compulsory) Choose one: English / German / French / Spanish
Foreign Language 3 (Optional) Choose one: As above + Russian / Chinese / Arabic


.

4 persons have voted this message useful



cordelia0507
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5658 days ago

1473 posts - 2176 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 98 of 206
14 November 2009 at 12:47pm | IP Logged 
Furthermore, here is what would "cure" the English of their aversion to foreign languages:

Brit (in English): Excuse me where is the nearest metro station?
Frenchman (in French OR Esperanto): I am sorry, my English is not very good, how can I help you?

(repeat x26 across the EU... Eventually he'd get it... )

For speakers of smaller languages, the idea of leaving ones own country/area and still speak ones own language is ludicrous!

And imagine the attitude that a German person would get in London if he went up to the nearest Englishman and asked for directions in German...And while considering that, bear in mind that German is IN FACT a MUCH bigger EU language than English is.

"There is something rotten in the state of the.... EU....."

Anyway, I don't think this adds up. There is only one explanation for the domination of English in the EU and that explanation is not European.. so why are we accomodating it? Wake up, fellow union citizens! :-)


Edited by cordelia0507 on 14 November 2009 at 12:52pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5341 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 99 of 206
14 November 2009 at 1:15pm | IP Logged 
cordelia0507 wrote:
Wake up, fellow union citizens! :-)


Since at least 99% of the European population easily prefers English to Esperanto, you may have a hard time rallying support.

And what exactly is "fair" about forcing everyone in Europe to study a particular, made up language? Every country is equally oppressed by the central European dictatorship? I suppose that IS fair in a way.

And why discriminate against Arabic, Chinese or Swahili? In the interest of the state religion Multiculturalism, aren't all immigrant languages equally sacred?

Edited by Gusutafu on 14 November 2009 at 1:18pm

1 person has voted this message useful



cordelia0507
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5658 days ago

1473 posts - 2176 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 100 of 206
14 November 2009 at 2:38pm | IP Logged 
I think your personal view of the EU and issues such as "multiculturalism" is distracting you from the question of a common language for the EU.. I agree that those are important concerns, but:

If we take EU as a given (or pretend that Sweden isn't in the EU) then consider this:

1) A headmaster of a German school travels to a European conference on education, in Helsinki.
2) An EU expert on agriculture (Portuguese) is having lunch with a Polish colleague in Brussels.
3) An Italian chef is giving a lecture on pasta-making in Hungary...
4) A Greek policeman is liaiasing with a colleague in France about an escaped criminal.
5) An Austrian athlete participates in a competition in the Netherlands.

None of these are scenarios are unlikely in the least.

What is absurd about it is that their conversation is likely to be in English!

What possible justification could there be for this?

1) It's not the language of any of the people or places in the examples...
2) Both the German and the French speaking people are native speaker of languages that is BIGGER in the EU than English.
3) To get to a decent conversational level in English all of the people involved would have had to spend HUGE amounts of time that could be better spent on other things. This is particularly true for the speakers of non Germanic languages.

WHY in your opinion is it right for these people to speak English under the circumstances in the examples?



Edited by cordelia0507 on 14 November 2009 at 2:57pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5341 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 101 of 206
14 November 2009 at 3:13pm | IP Logged 
cordelia0507 wrote:
I think your personal view of the EU and issues such as "multiculturalism" is distracting you from the question of a common language for the EU.. I agree that those are important concerns, but:

If we take EU as a given (or pretend that Sweden isn't in the EU) then consider this:

1) A headmaster of a German school travels to a European conference on education, in Helsinki.
2) An EU expert on agriculture (Portuguese) is having lunch with a Polish colleague in Brussels.
3) An Italian chef is giving a lecture on pasta-making in Hungary...
4) A Greek policeman is liaiasing with a colleague in France about an escaped criminal.
5) An Austrian athlete participates in a competition in the Netherlands.

None of these are scenarios are unlikely in the least.

What is absurd about it is that their conversation is likely to be in English!

What possible justification could there be for this?

1) It's not the language of any of the people or places in the examples...
2) Both the German and the French speaking people are native speaker of languages that is BIGGER in the EU than English.
3) To get to a decent conversational level in English all of the people involved would have had to spend HUGE amounts of time that could be better spent on other things. This is particularly true for the speakers of non Germanic languages.

WHY in your opinion is it right for these people to speak English under the circumstances in the examples?



It's pretty convenient, considering that they all will have studied English at school. It may be absurd that English is the lingua franca, but it is. I would have liked it to be Greek, Latin or even better, Old Church Slavonic. I could settle for German or French too, but English isn't that bad either. Isn't it because of familiarity that people dislike English as a lingua franca? If we all had to study French, do you think you would like that any better? Or Esperanto, that would be crazy! There is no Esperanto Shakespear, no Esperanto Dickens. Not even any Esperanto CSI!

One thing that would be even more absurd than using English, a third language so to speak, would be to use a language that isn't even spoken by anyone anywhere.

You also seem to be forgetting that English has a fantastic literary heritage, and is the main language of several very large and rich countries.
1 person has voted this message useful



Sennin
Senior Member
Bulgaria
Joined 5854 days ago

1457 posts - 1759 votes 
5 sounds

 
 Message 102 of 206
14 November 2009 at 4:18pm | IP Logged 
Gusutafu wrote:
It's pretty convenient, considering that they all will have studied English at school. It may be absurd that English is the lingua franca, but it is. I would have liked it to be Greek, Latin or even better, Old Church Slavonic. I could settle for German or French too, but English isn't that bad either. Isn't it because of familiarity that people dislike English as a lingua franca? If we all had to study French, do you think you would like that any better? Or Esperanto, that would be crazy! There is no Esperanto Shakespear, no Esperanto Dickens. Not even any Esperanto CSI!


I think doing business in Old Church Slavonic or Latin would be pretty cool, but not very practical. Greek would give an unfair advantage to the Greek people and they're already boastful of their history, the Brits are no match for them.

Esperanto is near the bottom of my list when it comes to the chic factor. The current situation with English being dominant is much preferable, at least it is a decent language with literature and all. ( ...and if people are multilingual they won't be so reliant on the lingua franca. )


Edited by Sennin on 14 November 2009 at 4:38pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Gusutafu
Senior Member
Sweden
Joined 5341 days ago

655 posts - 1039 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*

 
 Message 103 of 206
14 November 2009 at 5:07pm | IP Logged 
Sennin wrote:

I think doing business in Old Church Slavonic or Latin would be pretty cool, but not very practical. Greek would give an unfair advantage to the Greek people and they're already boastful of their history, the Brits are no match for them.


Not that you would have a head-start at Old Church Slavonic...

Sennin wrote:

Esperanto is near the bottom of my list when it comes to the chic factor. The current situation with English being dominant is much preferable, at least it is a decent language with literature and all. ( ...and if people are multilingual they won't be so reliant on the lingua franca. )


That's a very good point. Let English be one of the three or four languages each educated person knows. This probably won't happen, but it would be very much better than everyone knowing just their native language plus the lingua franca, or worse: just the lingua franca.
1 person has voted this message useful



cordelia0507
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 5658 days ago

1473 posts - 2176 votes 
Speaks: Swedish*
Studies: German, Russian

 
 Message 104 of 206
14 November 2009 at 5:57pm | IP Logged 
Literature is a "Red Herring" in this context.

What does Shakespeare and Dickens have to do with my ability to communicate with a Romanian or Dutch person in a mutually convenient language?

Of course English is more convenient for US PERSONALLY, who are reading this right now on this forum, and who have been through 10 years of compulsory English in school, university literature etc.

We are the perfect products of this system. I am saying, let's come up with a better solution now, to start introducing for future generations.

The British Empire is over
The Cold War is over.
The future of the US as the main world power or indeed a world power all is unclear.

New times, new language...

For that matter, Esperanto is so easy to learn, that we could all be speaking it fluently next year if we wanted. Tell that to a Pole or Greek person who can barely make himself understood after years of studying English.






2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 206 messages over 26 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 5.0625 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.