Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

German: Random questions

  Tags: Syntax | German
 Language Learning Forum : Questions About Your Target Languages Post Reply
126 messages over 16 pages: 1 2 3 4 57 ... 6 ... 15 16 Next >>
Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4643 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 41 of 126
17 June 2014 at 12:32pm | IP Logged 
1a. The cat must have escaped through the window.
1b. The cat had to escape through the window.

1b. doesn't sound very idiomatic though. Maybe "durchs Fenster" would be better here.

Edited by Josquin on 17 June 2014 at 12:32pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



Gemuse
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 3881 days ago

818 posts - 1189 votes 
Speaks: English
Studies: German

 
 Message 42 of 126
17 June 2014 at 1:54pm | IP Logged 
Aha! Thanks. "Must have" - this is a new construct for me.

Are these correct:

2: Ich muss einen Fehler gemacht haben.
"I must have made a mistake".

3: Ich soll das Buch gelesen haben.
"I should have read the book".

1 person has voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4643 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 43 of 126
17 June 2014 at 1:58pm | IP Logged 
2. Correct.

3. "I should" = "ich sollte". Otherwise, the sentence is correct.
1 person has voted this message useful



fnord
Triglot
Groupie
Switzerland
Joined 4832 days ago

71 posts - 124 votes 
Speaks: German*, Swiss-German, English
Studies: Luxembourgish, Dutch

 
 Message 44 of 126
18 June 2014 at 12:46am | IP Logged 
Josquin wrote:
1a. The cat must have escaped through the window.
1b. The cat had to escape through the window.

1b. doesn't sound very idiomatic though. Maybe "durchs Fenster" would be better here.

I agree that "durchs Fenster" would be much better. I think that would be a translation made with at least a small
degree of assumption.
Literally translated...
1a. Die Katze muss zum Fenster entwischt sein.
1b. Die Katze musste zum Fenster entwischen.
...both mean she "supposedly made" (1a) or "had to make" (1b) it to the window, but not necessarily
through it.

Josquin wrote:
3. "I should" = "ich sollte". Otherwise, the sentence is correct.

This, in turn, sound somewhat unidiomatic to me though. I’m not sure if any native speaker would say this. Also, I
can hardly imagine the sentence to stand on its own properly:

“Ich sollte das Buch gelesen haben.” Would anybody say so? Maybe in few select cases, but not idiomatically so. It
would be perfectly used when indicating futurity, but even then, I’d expect some context be stated explicitly
(adverbially usually) in actual usage:

Ich sollte das Buch bis dann / bis Ende nächster Woche gelesen gelesen haben.
Back-translating this to English, this would be - If I am not mistaken - a text-book case for using “shall” instead
of “should”:
I shall have read the book by then / by the end of next week.

Otherwise, in the sense ot having read the book, even though one should have, I would rather suggest:

Ich hätte das Buch lesen sollen

I believe this captures the (usual) meaning of “I should have read the book” best and it is perfectly appropriate in
any register (whether more or less formal).


Edited by fnord on 18 June 2014 at 12:53am

2 persons have voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4643 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 45 of 126
18 June 2014 at 12:31pm | IP Logged 
fnord wrote:
Ich hätte das Buch lesen sollen

I believe this captures the (usual) meaning of “I should have read the book” best and it is perfectly appropriate in any register (whether more or less formal).

This is of course correct. It seems I have been reading too much English lately, so English syntax is starting to creep into my German.

Concerning "zum Fenster entwischen": It doesn't necessarily mean "escape to the window". In slightly old-fashioned German, "zum Fenster entwischen" can actually mean "escape through the window". This probably isn't what most people would say today, but it's a possible translation. On a related note, confer also: "zum Fenster hinaus" = "out of the window".

Edited by Josquin on 18 June 2014 at 12:36pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



daegga
Tetraglot
Senior Member
Austria
lang-8.com/553301
Joined 4320 days ago

1076 posts - 1792 votes 
Speaks: German*, EnglishC2, Swedish, Norwegian
Studies: Danish, French, Finnish, Icelandic

 
 Message 46 of 126
19 June 2014 at 12:26am | IP Logged 
fnord wrote:

“Ich sollte das Buch gelesen haben.” Would anybody say so? Maybe in few select cases,
but not idiomatically so.


I would, but with a different meaning. It means "As far as I know I've read the book,
but I'm not 100% sure".
1 person has voted this message useful



Gemuse
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 3881 days ago

818 posts - 1189 votes 
Speaks: English
Studies: German

 
 Message 47 of 126
19 June 2014 at 4:58pm | IP Logged 
Thanks fnord, Josquin and daegga!

I could not have put "Ich hätte das Buch lesen sollen" together. I understand the words, and Konjunctiv II, but I cannot figure out how they combine to produce the given sentence with the desired meaning. So it's a new construct for me.


Another question:
Das hat sicher Spaß gemacht.

According the words, I get "That had certainly fun made". I am confused by the "Das". Who had fun? If "Das" is talking about an activity, should it not rather be "Es war sicher Spaß"?
1 person has voted this message useful



Josquin
Heptaglot
Senior Member
Germany
Joined 4643 days ago

2266 posts - 3992 votes 
Speaks: German*, English, French, Latin, Italian, Russian, Swedish
Studies: Japanese, Irish, Portuguese, Persian

 
 Message 48 of 126
19 June 2014 at 5:59pm | IP Logged 
Gemuse wrote:
I could not have put "Ich hätte das Buch lesen sollen" together. I understand the words, and Konjunctiv II, but I cannot figure out how they combine to produce the given sentence with the desired meaning. So it's a new construct for me.

You need to learn this construction seperately, as it applies to all modal verbs (müssen, sollen, dürfen, können, wollen, mögen). For these verbs, the Perfekt and all tenses derived from it are formed with "haben" + infinitive + infinitive of the modal verb:

Er hat es nicht tun können. = He couldn't do it.
Er hätte es nicht tun sollen. = He shouldn't have done it.
Ich habe es nicht essen mögen. = I didn't like to eat it.

Quote:
Another question:
Das hat sicher Spaß gemacht.

According the words, I get "That had certainly fun made". I am confused by the "Das". Who had fun? If "Das" is talking about an activity, should it not rather be "Es war sicher Spaß"?

It's completely irrelevant whether you say "es" or "das". Both mean the same: "It was fun." In this case, "das" is a demonstrative pronoun referring to the activity you mentioned earlier.

"Es war Spaß" is a literal translation from English and no idiomatic German expression. You cannot translate literally between two different languages and expect to get a valid sentence.

"Spaß machen" = "to be fun"

Edited by Josquin on 19 June 2014 at 6:01pm



2 persons have voted this message useful



This discussion contains 126 messages over 16 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 57 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.3125 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.