Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

How do polyglots do it?

  Tags: Polyglot
 Language Learning Forum : General discussion Post Reply
159 messages over 20 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 9 ... 19 20 Next >>
s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5219 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 65 of 159
09 January 2014 at 3:53pm | IP Logged 
The question of whether it's harder to go from C1 to C2 in a "hard" language like Japanese than in a "easier"
language like German is intriguing and difficult to answer. I certainly don't have the answer. But it raises two
points that I would like to address.

When we speak of the intrinsic difficulties of languages, we refer to two things. First, the writing system. A
different way of writing is a killer. Second, the structural distance between one's native language and the target
language. I think we can safely assume that languages related to one's own are easier to learn than more distant
ones.

At the same time, we notice that all speakers learn to speak their native language spontaneously and easily. I
don't think that Japanese is harder for Japanese children than German is for German children. There may be some
issues of learning academic language for the school systems, but I'm thinking more of speaking the language.

Just last night, a Chinese friend was showing me something on his smartphone that is configured in Chinese. I'm
always flabbergasted when I see this. I say to myself, how can anybody in the world understand a writing system
that is so complicated? But my Chinese friends say to me that French is way more complicated than Chinese,

Although I readily admit that the writing system is probably the biggest stumbling block when starting the so-
called difficult languages, I don't believe that the speaking systems of languages are hugely different in terms of
difficulty. As Benny the Irish polyglot has shown, you can get the basics of any language in three months in the
right circumstances. Writing is another story.

As I have mentioned earlier, when we talk about time and difficulty in learning languages, we tend to forget the
context of learning, and particularly the role of immersion. Learning Mandarin in China and Mandarin in New
York city are two vastly different experiences.

All this makes me think that when discuss polyglots and hyperpolyglots, we never refer to their writing skills. To
my knowledge we rarely see -- I may be wrong -- blogs or posts of polyglots in other languages. Iversen is the
exception that comes to mind. I think we must admit that speaking and writing are two very different skills.

Edit: I had written my post before reading Hungringo's post that I totally agree with.

Edited by s_allard on 09 January 2014 at 5:30pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



Hungringo
Triglot
Senior Member
United Kingdom
Joined 3777 days ago

168 posts - 329 votes 
Speaks: Hungarian*, English, Spanish
Studies: French

 
 Message 66 of 159
09 January 2014 at 4:14pm | IP Logged 
Of course, when I said that Japanese written with Latin characters would be easier for Hungarians than German, I had in mind exclusively linguistic considerations. However, as we all know, languages are socio-cultural phenomena and we can't just separate them from their culture. As a Hungarian I share cultural references, a common history and way of life with my German-speaking Austrian neighbours. With Japanese people I might share some grammatical concepts, but that's it, we don't really have common cultural reference points.

Culture can become crucially important when you are moving from C1 to C2. At that level it is not just about using the right suffix and knowing the irregular verbs, but you have to be able to act and speak within a cultural context. The more alien this cultural context is, the more difficult will be to get it right. You need to understand not only allusions to historical figures and literary works, but also what, when and to whom NOT to say.

Edited by Hungringo on 09 January 2014 at 4:15pm

3 persons have voted this message useful



patrickwilken
Senior Member
Germany
radiant-flux.net
Joined 4322 days ago

1546 posts - 3200 votes 
Studies: German

 
 Message 67 of 159
09 January 2014 at 4:29pm | IP Logged 
s_allard wrote:

All this makes me think that when discuss polyglots and hyperpolyglots, we never refer to their writing skills. To
my knowledge we rarely see -- I may be wrong -- blogs or posts of polyglots in other languages. Iversen is the
exception


I find writing the easiest way to tell if someone is C2 or not. Because I am a native level English speaker when I was an academic I used to get lots of people asking me to read their papers before submission. I was always amazed how bad the writing can be of someone who apparently speaks English at a good C1 level.

While bad writing by first-year students writing in their L1 can be explained by lack of knowledge about how to write (how to structure and argument, how to edit etc) it can't be the full story for well-established professors who are writing in a foreign language, who certainly have lots of knowledge about how to write in their L1.

My guess is that vocabulary and syntactical structures are much simpler in everyday spoken speech compared to professional writing, so weaknesses in language skills can often be masked if all you have to judge someone by is by their conversational abilities. It's relatively easy to write accurate, but obtuse text; what is really hard is to write about a complex subject in a simple and accessible fashion. I think that only happens when you have a really nuanced grasp of a language's vocabulary and style.

Edited by patrickwilken on 09 January 2014 at 4:48pm

2 persons have voted this message useful



Guests
Guest Group
Joined 7165 days ago

0 - 22 votes
Logged on

 
 Message 68 of 159
09 January 2014 at 6:35pm | IP Logged 
Writing isn't real as far as language is concerned. You can find a C2 learner who writes
better than a native high school dropout, but you'll never find one who can speak better.



patrickwilken
Senior Member
Germany
radiant-flux.net
Joined 4322 days ago

1546 posts - 3200 votes 
Studies: German

 
 Message 69 of 159
09 January 2014 at 6:50pm | IP Logged 
swefn wrote:
Writing isn't real as far as language is concerned. You can find a C2 learner who writes
better than a native high school dropout, but you'll never find one who can speak better.


This seems to be conflating "native" with "highest level" obtainable (see prior post).

I am confident that there are high school dropouts who speak poorer English than a strong C2 speaker. I know because I have met them.



Edited by patrickwilken on 09 January 2014 at 6:53pm

1 person has voted this message useful



Cristianoo
Triglot
Senior Member
Brazil
https://projetopoligRegistered users can see my Skype Name
Joined 3910 days ago

175 posts - 289 votes 
Speaks: Portuguese*, FrenchB2, English
Studies: Russian

 
 Message 70 of 159
09 January 2014 at 6:53pm | IP Logged 
swefn wrote:
Writing isn't real as far as language is concerned. You can find a C2
learner who writes
better than a native high school dropout, but you'll never find one who can speak
better.


I don't believe this. I know a guy here at my job that is Spanish native (colombian)
and speaks portuguese better than some brazilians and writes it better too. I'm not
sure but I guess people use to create some sort of aura around native speaking skills
like it is an impenetrable shield.

I think if a person lives long enough in a country, using it's language as primary
source on a daily basis, I don't see why is not possible to speak it even better than
some natives.


2 persons have voted this message useful



s_allard
Triglot
Senior Member
Canada
Joined 5219 days ago

2704 posts - 5425 votes 
Speaks: French*, English, Spanish
Studies: Polish

 
 Message 71 of 159
09 January 2014 at 7:43pm | IP Logged 
patrickwilken wrote:
s_allard wrote:

All this makes me think that when discuss polyglots and hyperpolyglots, we never refer to their writing skills. To
my knowledge we rarely see -- I may be wrong -- blogs or posts of polyglots in other languages. Iversen is the
exception


I find writing the easiest way to tell if someone is C2 or not. Because I am a native level English speaker when I was an academic I used to get lots of people asking me to read their papers before submission. I was always amazed how bad the writing can be of someone who apparently speaks English at a good C1 level.

While bad writing by first-year students writing in their L1 can be explained by lack of knowledge about how to write (how to structure and argument, how to edit etc) it can't be the full story for well-established professors who are writing in a foreign language, who certainly have lots of knowledge about how to write in their L1.

My guess is that vocabulary and syntactical structures are much simpler in everyday spoken speech compared to professional writing, so weaknesses in language skills can often be masked if all you have to judge someone by is by their conversational abilities. It's relatively easy to write accurate, but obtuse text; what is really hard is to write about a complex subject in a simple and accessible fashion. I think that only happens when you have a really nuanced grasp of a language's vocabulary and style.

I also see a lot of academic and business writing in French and English. And I wouldn't go so far as to say that good writing is indicative of C2 level but it writing well is certainly a skill in itself that must be learned quite distinctly from speaking. For native speakers, it is of course highly correlated with schooling in the language. I have no doubt that certain highly educated foreign learners can write better than poorly educated native speakers.
1 person has voted this message useful



Guests
Guest Group
Joined 7165 days ago

0 - 22 votes
Logged on

 
 Message 72 of 159
09 January 2014 at 7:48pm | IP Logged 
patrickwilken wrote:

I am confident that there are high school dropouts who speak poorer English than a
strong C2 speaker. I know because I have met them.



That's impossible. An L2 learner is only imitating the language. They're only speaking
something that resembles it. They'll never be able to speak as well as someone with an
innate understanding. Native speakers cannot make mistakes when speaking, and there's
no way an adult learner can ever reach that level.

Unless you're talking about silly prescriptive rules, a native speaker always wins.


Edited by swefn on 09 January 2014 at 7:49pm




This discussion contains 159 messages over 20 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 810 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 0.4844 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.