Register  Login  Active Topics  Maps  

Best Method or More Time ?

 Language Learning Forum : Learning Techniques, Methods & Strategies Post Reply
430 messages over 54 pages: << Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 31 ... 53 54 Next >>
CaitO'Ceallaigh
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
katiekelly.wordpress
Joined 6858 days ago

795 posts - 829 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Russian
Studies: Czech, German

 
 Message 241 of 430
02 May 2008 at 11:21am | IP Logged 
frenkeld wrote:
It's more that the issue of immigrants picking up the language in their new country is close to my heart, but is also one I have never quite made up my mind on.

On the one hand, it's awesome to watch people come to a country and after a while just speak the language. On the other, quite a few never do all that well, and then one asks oneself whether they simply didn't care enough or whether immersion is just another "method" of learning that works for some, but not for everyone.

Skype is not immersion - there is not enough context. If I walk into a vegetable store to buy vegetables, I have context. On Skype I do not.


Skype can still be input. It might not be "the best" input, but it is still input, and maybe the best you can do at that time.

Slucido had pointed out what he thought were the best methods, but I somehow took it in the context of that these (DVDs) were the best methods for him, at that time. It changes and can be different for everyone.

I thought the whole point of this was that there isn't a universal "best method," and what's more important is the time spent on the method that you like enough to keep using consistently, that you feel really works.

1 person has voted this message useful



slucido
Bilingual Diglot
Senior Member
Spain
https://goo.gl/126Yv
Joined 6676 days ago

1296 posts - 1781 votes 
4 sounds
Speaks: Spanish*, Catalan*
Studies: English

 
 Message 242 of 430
02 May 2008 at 11:25am | IP Logged 
CaitO'Ceallaigh wrote:

I thought the whole point of this was that there isn't a universal "best method," and what's more important is the time spent on the method that you like enough to keep using consistently, that you feel really works.


Yes, it that easy :-)

Some people feel good with extreme methods and others with average methods.

I really can not understand where is the problem.






Edited by slucido on 02 May 2008 at 11:26am

1 person has voted this message useful



CaitO'Ceallaigh
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
katiekelly.wordpress
Joined 6858 days ago

795 posts - 829 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Russian
Studies: Czech, German

 
 Message 243 of 430
02 May 2008 at 11:27am | IP Logged 
I don't think that they liked that you said a person can learn languages from DVDs alone or without ever using a dictionary. They thought you meant that was the ONLY way, or that was the best way, and everything else was just psychologal, or adornment, or not really necessary. And I think you were saying, psychologal or adornment or not, if it works, it works. Keep doing it.
1 person has voted this message useful



CaitO'Ceallaigh
Triglot
Senior Member
United States
katiekelly.wordpress
Joined 6858 days ago

795 posts - 829 votes 
Speaks: English*, Spanish, Russian
Studies: Czech, German

 
 Message 244 of 430
02 May 2008 at 11:32am | IP Logged 
Speaking of input, I had heard "red herring" so many times in my life, and I never really knew what I meant, so I looked it up in a dictionary of all things, and learned it means "something designed to change the subject, something that diverts attention." That's INPUT.

Then I looked it up in Spanish, and my new word for the day is "pista falsa".

So I just learned TWO words today, proving that even this circular debate can still yield positive INPUT. It took a lot of TIME, but I wouldn't have learned these words without it, but it was my PASSION that carried me through. :)
1 person has voted this message useful



frenkeld
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6944 days ago

2042 posts - 2719 votes 
Speaks: Russian*, English
Studies: German

 
 Message 245 of 430
02 May 2008 at 11:32am | IP Logged 
slucido wrote:
Dictionaries are a linguistic device that has a psychological component. The strength of this psychological factor depend on cognates and context. And it depends whether it's bilingual or monolingual as well. So what?


The point is that while using a dictionary may have some "psychological component", it is not just a placebo. Some of its effects are quite real. Therefore, methods that do not involve a dictionary (or its rough equivalent, a translation) may be much slower than those that do. Therefore, some methods are objectively different from other methods, which is one of the central points of contention in this thread. (A method, approach, whatever, isn't just about comparing Assimil and FSI - it must be seen more broadly.)

To reduce the number of posts, let me change the subject and get back to the "passion" issue. Of your two ingredients, time and passion, I find time to be a hard requirement, but I find passion to be a nice extra that is in no way fundamental to successful language-learning. You grew up in a Mediterranean country, you guys are all passionate and such. Where I grew up there were days with -30 Celsius outside, which left no room for passion. Still, some people learned their languages, and not only in the spring. People come with different characters and personalities, and some can make a decision to learn a language and sustain it without feeling any great passion for it, at least not all the time. In fact, a life-long commitment to a language is sometimes compared to marriage. Marriages that rely on passion alone to hold them together are known not to do very well on average. Some even say passion is secondary to a successful marriage.


Edited by frenkeld on 02 May 2008 at 11:42am

1 person has voted this message useful



frenkeld
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6944 days ago

2042 posts - 2719 votes 
Speaks: Russian*, English
Studies: German

 
 Message 246 of 430
02 May 2008 at 11:35am | IP Logged 
CaitO'Ceallaigh wrote:
Speaking of input, I had heard "red herring" so many times in my life, and I never really knew what I meant, so I looked it up in a dictionary of all things, and learned it means "something designed to change the subject, something that diverts attention." That's INPUT.


'Straw man' is another important concept to keep in mind while following this thread.


Edited by frenkeld on 02 May 2008 at 11:36am

1 person has voted this message useful



frenkeld
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6944 days ago

2042 posts - 2719 votes 
Speaks: Russian*, English
Studies: German

 
 Message 247 of 430
02 May 2008 at 11:40am | IP Logged 
CaitO'Ceallaigh wrote:
frenkeld wrote:
It's more that the issue of immigrants picking up the language in their new country is close to my heart, but is also one I have never quite made up my mind on.

On the one hand, it's awesome to watch people come to a country and after a while just speak the language. On the other, quite a few never do all that well, and then one asks oneself whether they simply didn't care enough or whether immersion is just another "method" of learning that works for some, but not for everyone.

Skype is not immersion - there is not enough context. If I walk into a vegetable store to buy vegetables, I have context. On Skype I do not.


Skype can still be input. It might not be "the best" input, but it is still input, and maybe the best you can do at that time.


Well, for those people who can't even learn with the best input there is, full immersion, Skype surely won't be of much use.

The question is whether "input+output+time" are all it takes for everyone. I am still on the fence about it even in the full immersion situations. You must have met quite a few East Asians whose English remains rather poor throughout their lives. Do they lack passion for English, or could it be that some of them have neuronal circuitry that needs more than "input+output+time"?


Edited by frenkeld on 02 May 2008 at 11:46am

1 person has voted this message useful



frenkeld
Diglot
Senior Member
United States
Joined 6944 days ago

2042 posts - 2719 votes 
Speaks: Russian*, English
Studies: German

 
 Message 248 of 430
02 May 2008 at 11:41am | IP Logged 
slucido wrote:
I prefer Skype or telephone, because I don't have visual context, it's harder and I learn more.


Have you ever tried full immersion? If yes, for how long?



1 person has voted this message useful



This discussion contains 430 messages over 54 pages: << Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54  Next >>


Post ReplyPost New Topic Printable version Printable version

You cannot post new topics in this forum - You cannot reply to topics in this forum - You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum - You cannot create polls in this forum - You cannot vote in polls in this forum


This page was generated in 4.4219 seconds.


DHTML Menu By Milonic JavaScript
Copyright 2024 FX Micheloud - All rights reserved
No part of this website may be copied by any means without my written authorization.